A bad book, not recommended

It's a pretty bad book. The "Game Bell" complicates rather than anything else the explanation of Bell's theorem and inequality (much more clearly explained, without vulgar popularization, with 'Espagnat in "In Search of the real"), any exposure this subtle subject is imbued with a naive realism (like "crystals have entangled"), which demonstrates a confusion between state quantum Shopsystems and what we can actually observe (NEVER is observed entanglement obviously the entangled states is not an observable phenomenon, but a probabilistic prediction about what poura be seen ... and which only we can deduce that there was entanglement) ... This really is discourage louse who wants to know what it is, because it introduces all the false ideas of classical realism applied to quantum (of the kind of "remote influence" and other nonsense). There curious account on vitese of light (compared to viteses sound, and therefore could be considered to exceed one day ... As if c was a speed, among others, not the constant of Einstein's space-time). And the words of Bohr are inept. The author seems not to have understood, or he pretends, that Bohr (and Einstein!) Meant by "complete theory" (particularly in the context of the EPR paper), who did not want to say absolutely exhaustive theory. It is appalling that such a book sloppy, superficial, and epistemologically very debatable (and educationally harmful) is published by a publisher who has accustomed us to more quality and rigor. Quantum physics deserves better.

Stay away for those who want to learn the mysteries of quantum non-locality. Read more Bernard Espagnat.