A hitherto unique compact camera (compared with Fuji X10, Canon S95, Sony NEX-5N, Canon 40D)

A hitherto unique compact camera (compared with Fuji X10, Canon S95, Sony NEX-5N, Canon 40D)

Sony DSC-RX100 Cyber-shot digital camera (20 megapixels, optical zoom 3.6x, 7.6 cm (3 inch) display, fast aperture. 28 - 100 mm zoom lens F1.8 - 4.9, Full HD image stabilized) (Electronics)

Customer Review

Actually, I had the Sony DSC-RX100, perished no longer on the radar after a preview on DPReview contained the odd sample photo on the details such as blades of grass in a quite a Pixelbrei. Then I thought: "Aha, but probably again a camera that gives away too many unnecessary pixels their potential and the attention to detail the sacrifices Megapixelwahn at high ISO." I was happy with my recently acquired Fuji X10 (see also my review diesbzgl.) And my Sony NEX-5N and - for cases where it would be really small needs - my Canon S95. For home and "special tasks" I still have a SLR camera based on the Canon EOS 40D. Case settled ... actually ...
Only by further, very positive, partly euphoric test and advice on the net as well as comments on my Fuji X10 review I became aware of the RX100 again. Pretty soon, the question arose whether this could be a good replacement for my "always there" but not -Canon S95 (the X10 is for me still too big). The dimensions are yes - apart from a few millimeters more in depth - comparable. So I have the time for appeal ordered RX100 (easier said than done, see below).

Technically considered, the Sony has a smooth twice as large as the sensor surface (already not low) sensor surface of the Fuji X10. The area is almost three times as large as that of a Canon S100 (should be the same as the S95), but only about a third as large as that of an APS-C sensor. It is amazing how the technology evolves: bring my Canon EOS 40D from 2008 "only" 10 MP on a APS-C sensor, the RX100, however, twice as many (20 MP) on one-third of this area. Power mathematically factor 6 without - to anticipate it right - noise performance and attention to detail including suffering.

The sensationally good noise performance at high detail is then actually a real highlight of this camera. Up to ISO 800 without any problem, evident namely in ISO 1600 have an (at least at 100% view) clearly visible grain, but the attention to detail is very high. Even at ISO 3200 is changing only marginally, and even ISO 6400 can still be used! Subjectively, the RX100 is thus at least on par with the X10 (which roughly equally good results, but in the 6 MP EXR mode, achieved), the Sony NEX-5N (in particular this is amazing because it is still relatively new and for their "only" 16 MP has nevertheless an APS-C sensor is available) and the Canon 40D (at least until ISO 1600, about the 40D almost useless). The Canon S95 falls next to this quartet from very clear, here are useful results really only possible to ISO 800 (with pixel binning, but this goes to 2.5 MP reduced resolution course at the S95 more, but this mode I consider outside the competition).

The 20 MP of the RX100 are therefore (both mathematically and by the practice) justified and thus offer enormous scope for Crops and large format includes prints. Nevertheless, I like not imagine what potential this camera with only 10-12 MP would ... I believe that would be the (yet) been better approach because massive Crops I'm at least very rarely, and A3 includes prints I have made Canon EOS 10D without these details could be missed - even by 6 MP images of my - now retired. The reducible to 10 MP image size of the RX100 is not an option, because in this mode, no pixel binning is made, but the 20 MP only be downscaled.
Well, you may just not have it all ...

Compared with the direct rival Fuji X10 is noticeable that there are not so many function exclusions far: Yes, in the RX100 can I select a AF point manually without turning off the face detection. Yes, the RX100 can Program-Shift despite auto ISO. Yes, she also writes RAW files in all positions of the selector dial, as far as I could find so far (except for the movies, of course). And so on. Of course the Sony is not perfect: For example, I can not photograph during movie recording shoot (although the principle is to be possible) and just do not know why (probably because I have set as the output format RAW + JPEG ?!). The operation of the RX100 is still a total no-frills and significantly less "diva-like" than the X10. Anyone familiar with the Sony World already, will anyway have no problems.

By contrast, the X10 holds the better "grip"; you happens to have a bit more material in hand, everything is less delicate than the Sony. There are more hardware buttons for key functions available, which is often advantageous. Genial in the X10 is also the mechanical zoom ring simultaneously on / off switch. Fast can hardly be ready to fire a compact. The RX100 is here conventional: press on / off button, wait until the lens is extended, change focal length by motor; everything a bit slow. The - to smooth for my taste - lens ring is there more of a gimmick than real value, I use him as good as not.
The X10 also scores with its long end significantly (1.5 stops) better light intensity.

The RX100 is then subjectively again when shooting a little faster (AF, shutter lag) as the X10, though there are nuances. The disadvantage I find that between "shutter button halfway" and "pressed all the" little room is; it happened to me many times before that I took the photo, although I wanted to examine only times only AF and exposure.

One oddity that maybe only applies to my copy: It is to me so far not succeeded in using the supplied charging equipment to charge the battery in the camera. The USB port of a PC, the camera is detected correctly, however. The relevant menu item ("USB power" or so) is also enabled. The charging indicator light will remain despite everything out (and the battery is actually not loaded), whether at the PC USB port, the included USB power adapter or other USB power adapter. But no matter, I find this kind of battery charging anyway bad and always invite my batteries with a Pixo C2 + outside the camera, so it does not bother me ultimately.

Time for a summary of the pros and cons:

++ Excellent image quality (natural colors, enormous wealth of details).
++ Excellent noise performance, especially for a compact.
++ Speed.
++ Uncomplicated handling, adaptability of the controls.
++ High-quality finish.

+ Dimensions (only one plus for the pretty expansive depth).
+ Clearly structured menu.
+ Fewer feature exclusions (compared to the X10).

+/- Battery life (much better than the X10, but there is for the X10 unbeatable favorable third-party batteries).

- Relatively faint at the long end (but F4.9 is still better than for example F5.9 at S95).
- For the size heavy.
- A little handy case (where there is a remedy => Google search for "Richard Franiec").
- Insufficient clearance between shutter button halfway / fully depressed.
- Battery-charging in the camera. (In this price range an external charger should be a matter of course.)
- Complete German manual (still) unavailable.
- RAW support in Lightroom or DxO Optics Pro (yet) available.

That's enough for a minimum of 4.5 stars, especially as some disadvantages will do sooner or later. Rounded in favor of the candidate, the then 5 stars.

What do I do now? The RX100 is really my "new S95." I treat myself beyond the luxury not to have to decide, including the X10 (which is now "grown to love" me despite their quirks) to keep. The NEX-5N and the 40D equipment for "special operations" remain anyway. So I will indeed continue to have the 'spoiled for choice', but each camera has its special qualities and therefore justified. ;-)

Pocket Tip (for the belt): The original Sony LCS-CSQ (the RX100 fits quite precisely, but itself remains in the pocket no more room for a spare battery), or even better, the Lowepro Rezo 30 (the RX100 fits with some air , then go forward to the main compartment even spare battery and memory card easily in).

Availability: Strange that the RX100 here at Amazon just today (as at 31.07.2012) is available, but apparently Sony has underestimated the demand. In Sony online store (that I bought) or stationary dealers she was to get course for a while now.

Sound System Rank: 5/5
November 9
Very good 31 1 Rank: 5/5
January 7
the good M. CONNELLY Rank: 5/5
April 24
A beautiful full Rank: 5/5
April 24
PRODUCT NA NEVER SUMMER BOOK Rank: 2/5
July 29

Related Reviews


Very good "compact camera", compared with G16Sony DSC-RX100 Cyber-shot digital camera (20 megapixels, optical zoom 3.6x, 7.6 cm (3 inch) display, fast aperture. 28 - 100 mm zoom lens F1.8 - 4.9, Full HD image stabilized) (Electronics) Very good action cam with unique selling points compared with GoProSony HDR-AS30VW Wearable Mount Kit - Ultra-compact Action Cam (Exmor R CMOS sensor, Full HD, PS / WIFI / NFC Function Kit) (Electronics) With the right lenses, the right post and some experience a bit camera - compared with NEX-6Sony Alpha 6000 system camera (24 megapixels, 7.6 cm (3 ") LCD display, Exmor APS-C sensor, Full HD, high-speed hybrid AF) black (Camera) Unique compact cameraSigma DP3 Merrill Digital Camera (46 Megapixel, 7.6 cm (3 inch) LCD display, SD / SDXC card slot) (Electronics) Visually superb, bulky, expensive - compared with Fuji XF 35mm 1.4Fujifilm Fujinon XF 23mm F1.4 R lens (optional) Better than the Sony SAL18250, compared with Tamron 70-300 USD (Sony a77 II) (### ### update 02/08/2015)Tamron 16-300mm F / 3.5-6.3 Di II SO / AF Macro for Sony PZD (Accessories) Upgrading the X10 - Is the X30 still relevant? Compared with other compactFujifilm X30 Digital Camera (12MP, 4x opt. Zoom, HDMI, USB 2.0) (Electronics) Beautiful, fast, compact camera with good image qualityNikon Coolpix S9500 Digital Camera (18 Megapixel, 22x opt. Zoom, 7.6 cm (3 inch) OLED screen, image stabilizer) (Electronics) Fujifilm F70EXR - a very good compact cameraFujifilm Finepix F70 EXR Digital Camera (10 Megapixel, 10x opt. Zoom, 6.9 cm (2.7 inch) display, Image Stabilizer) Silver (Electronics) perfect compact camera? Unfortunately not ...Nikon Coolpix P300 Digital Camera (12MP, 4x opt. Zoom, 7.5 cm (3 inch) display, Full HD Video) (Electronics) Expectations completely - compact camera with high image qualityFujifilm X-M1 compact system camera (16 megapixels, 7.6 cm (3 inch) LCD, Full HD, WiFi) body only (Electronics) Very good, compact system camera bundled with a rather average lensSony NEX-5TLB Compact system camera (16.1 megapixels Exmor APS-C CMOS sensor, 7.6 cm (3 inch) LCD, Full HD, WiFi, NFC) incl. SEL-P1650 black (Electronics) One of the best compact cameras with good price-performance ratioFujifilm FinePix F200EXR Digital Camera (12MP, 5x opt. Zoom, 3 '' display, image stabilizer) Silver (Electronics) Super compact camera with only a few drawbacksPanasonic Lumix DMC-TZ8EG-S Digital Camera (12 Megapixel 12x opt. Zoom, 6.9 cm (2.7 inch) display, Image Stabilizer) Silver (Electronics) Compact camera with a lot of gimmicks and poor image qualityNikon Coolpix S6400 compact camera (16 megapixel, 12x opt. Zoom, 7.6 cm (3 inches) touch screen) Blue (Electronics) Great compact camera with lots of extrasCanon PowerShot G12 Digital Camera (10 Megapixel, 5x opt. Zoom, 7.0 cm (2.8 inch) display, image stabilized) (Electronics) A noble and versatile high-end compact camera with excellent image quality - but too big and too heavy in the PowerShot family?Canon PowerShot G1X Mark II Digital Camera (12.8 megapixels, 5x optical zoom, 1: 2-3.9, 24-mm wide angle, Full HD CMOS sensor) (Electronics) Good compact camera with small weaknessesPanasonic Lumix DMC-TZ22EG-R Digital Camera (14 Megapixel, 16x opt. Zoom, 7.5 cm (3 inches) touch LCD screen, GPS, Full HD, 3D, image stabilized) Red (Electronics)