I also specify that I am not homophobic or homophilic or against the changes of manners. I also said that the law on marriage for all in France a new law that will come into effect soon and certainly it will be a legal possibility that I will not argue, however, I feel I have the right to have my personal beliefs screws Screw this legislation, because I live in a democratic country which guarantees freedom of opinion and expression.
A, Mr. Hefez, however if you read this comment one day, know that I hated at the highest point your book and your thinking.
You advocate a new sexual order which have to be, in your opinion, the best new way companies would have run.
You oppose a totalitarian society by another totalitarianism assexuellisant.
To you read it looks like you're the only one on earth to hold the Truth The Truth and that only your way of seeing things is the only way forward for the future. Frankly for a psychoanalyst your ego is more than excessive, how can you have the audacity to claim that you are the only one to hold the absolute truth.
Also feel free to support your theory smoker to lynch colleagues psychiatrists or psychoanalysts, citing passages from their works to better the low descendre.C'est as a process, it is small and mean (hopefully these same colleagues take up the pen to answer you what I will be delighted) .You speak of scientific studies without citing the sources of these études.Je reminder that for all publications advancing the study results one must mention its sources.Parfois in fact you cite sources on alleged polls as everyone knows contain bias and are always oriented and therefore scientifically invalid.
You say loud and clear that we are all bisexual ???? You even insist by saying that we are all fighting to not succumb to the temptation to have sex with someone of the same sex .Personnellement it never happened to me in 46 years of my life. Your theory is false and does not apply to everyone.
In your book you descend steeply all representations masculines.Cela is not new I attend myself as a man '' male '' for twenty years in order to dismantling of male identity in the outright aim of eradicating it in favor of other values which I do not subscribe.
You claim that a baby is in utero from a baby girl and that after a few weeks that it would become a baby boy after impregnation of hormones.
I doubt your theory, a baby is from the beginning of conception, from the fertilization of the ovum, already determined by the chromosomes, there is not really a lack of differentiation as if eventually sex selection will rest on a roullette or go out once a boy suddenly a girl. I beg you to reconsider your course médecine.En effect is either the sperm carrying a Y chromosome or an X chromosome which determines from the fertilization of the egg the child's sex naitre.Le body baby effect is initially undifferentiated but already chromosomally already déterminé.Pour a psychiatrist, it's really hard to present your vision of determining the sex of children in a truncated appearance of truth.
You take the examples that serve you!
You claim that the anatomical differences between men and women are minor, it is strange for a doctor. The difference between a vagina and a penis is a minor?
Also once you get Freud kick after you use it to support your theory is frankly baffling why this dichotomy (ca dichotomy is a word very popular with psychoanalysts).
Why descend steeply heterosexual education? She did well on those bad sides like all other types of educations, like her good cotés.N'y Does not he happy women to be women raising children in the home? Why this would be it bad to be so happy? For a woman to Oyer intelligentsia is necessarily unhappy and pointed as a victim of male oppression! There to women who are happy beings housewives mind you.
Is it so wrong to offer cars to a little boy and dolls to girls ??
This new neutralizing education, I think is a abération.Certes there are men and women who feel bad in the body that assigned them by society or birth, yes we must leave the choice has some minorities to choose their déféinitif sex and to ensure that they find a épanouissement.De more you talk about this experience made in a Scandinavian school or the children of both sexes are indiférencit or using pronouns neutres.Je am against this kind of pratique.D a children are not guinea pigs for experiments, two are germinated in them the idea that they are neither men nor women, and they will have to position themselves in relation to this mêmes.Des of them children that age they can at least understand the issues that represent?
You talk about sexual identity problems, know that there are writers who are doing much better than you and impartial way and just as a witness, not as proselytizing.
Also your New supposedly sexual builds on the destruction of heterosexual models, why not let coexist different models? It's still hard ca looks like we need to go through the destruction to build a new order. But so let freedom for people to choose from, your attitude is dictatorial limit. It even dictates that you reproach to heterosexual! I am happy that now everyone could choose destiny sounds the way it wishes, but thanks so let heterosexuals in peace, they too have the right to do as their look .All ways of life can coexist. It is through the coexistence and diversity that will be the future world.
That said everyone is free to raise their children according to their own model we do not need nicknames junk thinkers to lead his life.
Frankly I found your execrable book! Also I suspect you for writing this book only for commercial purposes and crass mercantile surfing the news of sexual identity and marriage for tous.Puis your literary style is more doubtful for a pseudo sociological work, rude words like '' balls '' '' Bint '' are present in your work, it is a shame and shocking for a book that deals with serious problems.
No, I never will adhere to all of these thought currents that seek to dismantle some old ancient representations that are wrong with personne.Cette differentiation in children's education is totally contrary to my own values and no law will prohibit me to raise my children as good I think.
I never would read one of your books, and I pourant amateur book dealing with psychanalysen psychology and development personnel.Votre book is poorly written, vulgar, lying, oriented, insidious and leaving open many as heard and Commercial basely. Your book will not remain in the annals of literature, and that's good.
Also as I am the first to make a comment on Amazon a few weeks after the launch of your book, it shows how little has interest in your book. You made white cabbage!
Somehow I rather regret having spoken this book because it makes him an advertisement.
For readers:
Do as you wish after having read my comment, but certainly I really do not recommend this book or this pseudo book, it adds nothing to the understanding of certain social problems and more this book is very partisan.
I will not keep this book in my library.
