+ Compared to a battery-operated hand vacuum cleaner: excellent suction power
+ Cable length in any case sufficient, though could still be a little longer (replugging remains mostly not spared) be
+ Good accessory, there is provided a hose, and two brush heads, as well as a shoulder strap band to not carry the vacuum cleaner in hand have ... Small objects, niches, an office desk can with accessories brush quickly and especially material-friendly from Dust be freed. In practice, I think the cleaner but rather in the hand (only in combination with the tube proves the shoulder straps to help!)
+ Cleaning of the dust container is actually very simple: the vacuum cleaner can be separated into two parts, the front part (see item picture) then includes the sucked dust. For this you just have to remove the permanent filter and let the dust will fall out of the front part.
+ The price of the terminal speaks for itself, around EUR 20,00 are a very good price for such a device
+ Compared to battery-powered competitors: no power consumption when not in operation (cordless tools invite usually constantly in the dock on)
~ Cable companies (described at this point neither advantage nor a disadvantage. Cable operation has of course always the advantage of multi-power, the simultaneous disadvantage of the lack of or reduced range of motion
~ Cleaning the motor filter: I myself have been able to make any experience - I have just been read online from a very difficult task (so I series this point to the neutral rating a - for lack of self-experience)
~ Vacuum cleaner can be set up by two plastic stand back upright and keep so. In itself a nice gimmick, but by the extravagant long cable a farce ... (whither then with the cable to the optics will)
~ The engine seems to be so strong that one of the vacuum cleaner when switching almost out of hand flying (there is a strong jolt to the side when the engine starts to run - you can feel the power of the quasi it applies to tame;))
~ There is no power reduction - only one entry and Anschalter (I do not really feel as appreciable advantage or disadvantage)
- Comparatively (in addition to power-operated also to battery-powered vacuum cleaners) very, very loud
- Immense, unpleasant to toxic odor during operation of the vacuum cleaner: I have my pre-reviewers to confirm the smell is extremely strong perceived, causes headache and is fast even after intensive ventilation still perceptible. I am far from being delicate with this subject, but so intense I've never experienced before: /
- The air outlet of the nipple is so strong that the vacuum cleaner in operation partially even kicking up more dust than it can absorb in the end! The lateral outlets blow quasi perpendicular on the vacuum cleaner, so that the dust is literally whirled into the air (this strong wind caused certainly the massive distribution of chemical odor during operation)
- Cable is long, a repositioning is but inevitable rule
- Cable interferes somehow also in operation, for example, when cleaning a desk ... can it ever happen that you knocked over a glass of water with the entrained cable ...
- Cable interferes by its length even when stowing the device would be useful vll a small cable reel been that can retract the cable automatically, so the cable must be permanently "cleaned manually" are (in order to avoid the formation of knots, etc)
- The processing of the accessories is not necessarily the best - it may well be that a flotterer Verschweiß takes place, especially in the brush - the rattle from the start and just look very, very cheap (in this case arises in the future, the question: are it to purchase replacement brush, for this particular inlet shape of the sucker?)
personal conclusion:
I have my device returned back to Amazon, after a few start-ups is the aforementioned smell just been unsustainable, he was not really less with time. The absence of dust was virtually offset by this immense odors. In addition, it has thrown me twice the backups during operation. (This fact is not taken into account in the assessment, especially since the hope is indeed a non-standard-fact)