Originally I wanted the 100 to buy a LED pocket projector for presentations in my professional environment and occasional private gadgets for order, but then the World Cup and the 179-range for this projector came!
In short: Whoever is looking for a cheap and reasonably high-intensity projector with no frills with all important basics that are both optimally as a presentation projector and simultaneously also largely suitable as a casual evening of TV gimmick for your living room, which is on this unit just as happy as I , From unpacking to first world live stream on 2 x 1,5m my living room wall thereby passed less than 10 minutes. For movies-look I stay definitely in my 47 "3D TV, but I did not previously clear.
So if you want to look 3D BlueRay movies, which invests at least twice in a better suitable for this projector or saving the money and sticks to his flat screen TV, or creates such in reasonable size, especially if the room can not be well darkened! The optional 3D function, the use of which one would have to obtain appropriate shutter glasses themselves is to truly understand the X113 only as a marketing gimmick.
A canvas you can save in my opinion at this resolution the way confidently, as long as you use a white wall as a projection screen. For me it is even structure wallpaper, giving the image, thanks to the solid light intensity does not diminish at all.
The lack of HDMI port is also bearable, because I doubt that at a native resolution of 800x600 using a HDMI to VGA converter (under 10 from China works properly) has any noticeable negative impact on the Bilsqualität. An adapter cable I would have needed anyway, since I run the projector almost exclusively on my Asus T100TA with Micro-HDMI port.
Speaking of resolution, here is the most important tip: Select the output device, even if it is a 16: 9 or 16: 10 device is a 4: 3 resolution (width \ height = 1.33) as close to 800x600 because that is the native aspect ratio of the projector!
When wider aspect ratios of 4: 3 sets, is simply the entire image smaller, because where will come from the extra width that ?! So you have, for example, in 16: 9 format, logically, nothing gained, but on the contrary lost from the outset image height, which otherwise for 4: 3 images would be available and then that will be invisible with black bars only in movies.
In addition, it makes no sense here, too easy with the resolution to go too high, because it is also better than 800x600 by, or perhaps because of, extrapolation of the image can not be that you simply have to accept.
I use eg in my native 1368x768 pixels TransformerBook with the beamer the lowest possible resolution of 1024x768 (= 4: 3), although recommended by the graphics driver 1920x1080. Thus, the image is so large and so rich in detail as I can. Here I use the option "Display / desktop / screen expand" and not "clone / copy", so that the display of the output device is still the optimal 1368x768 pixels are displayed while the projector is running only with the reduced resolution. Whatever you want to watch then, one simply pushes to the right of the image of the screen out to the second virtual desktop of the projector output and can then make the display of the output device and other things in parallel.