Can do a lot just no photos

Granted I ensure relatively high demands on a camera, since I photograph a lot.
(GNTB. Canon 5D Mark III, Panasonic GX 1 and Casio Exilim ZR 300).
For my Casio I thought would be the Galaxy Camera a great substitute, as the images are uploaded to the same Dropbox and friends / relatives who have images instantly.
Also for the short post snapshots the concept camera / mini tablet would not be bad.

Good on the camera does all the tablet / smartphone part.
Everything is almost as naturally as on the Galaxy Note II.
The missing phone function is a pity, but it's primarily a camera.

However Really bad is the camera part.
The image quality is very poor.
Slurred strongly blurred exteriors.
For Tungsten practically no sharp image while.
The flash is completely overridden - but can not be selected.
Another minus point, the flash pops up does not automatically when insufficient light is available.
The autofocus is miserably slow.
When artificial light is required again several attempts until an object is in focus.
The shutter lag is reminiscent of an old smartphone or digital camera from the last century.
Finally, I've made a few direct comparison pictures with the Galaxy Note II and that are better in all conditions.

Conclusion:

As camera actually useless, or for the price you can really expect more.
I have returned my back and wait for more of the things yet to come.