I I've posted a few pictures of my inner dividers. On this interior division based my review, because that one can use the full (considerable) height and depth of the pocket.
But here's the pros and cons (cons first, but the weigh in my eyes is not difficult).
(-) The pocket is deeper / "boxy" than expected. My wife laughed out loud when I said: "The does not look like a camera bag", so I modify the: "The still does not look like a typical camera bag" :-). The bag is nothing, if you want a slim messenger bag. But I think the depth is determined by the extent of my camera, and there outweigh the benefits (see below). If I need a messenger bag, I put a separate pad of purely in an existing pocket.
(-), The pocket is viewed from above slightly trapezoidal, which has presented a bit of space, makes for round lenses but from nothing.
(-) No velcro for the big mouth (but not RAAAATSCH when opening)
(-) No weatherproof floor (rubber / webs or similar)
But those were already the cons, now the positives:
(+) Super-padded, significantly stiffer than other pockets in the messenger style.
(+) Material makes a good impression, you will see it in the long run in durability
(+) I've played around a bit, because I was the camera too deep in your pocket, has wasted space above, and the land is too high for the lens (= camera tilts and projects upwards). Results can be seen in my pictures to "SLR Master": camera is on the mezzanine floor, under the camera and the attached lens is space (even for a flash!). Camera is mounted close at hand, safe and easy reinzustecken. In the large compartment beside fits even a 80-200mm f / 2.8, and the camera can be included 28-70 f / 2.8 even put in the bag (everything always without Streulichblende).
(+), The external dimensions are really tiny for the space
(+) By the boxy format and stiff padding is the bag itself.
(+) Flash and large lens fit well next to each other in the big trade, then the bag expands, however. Can endure it, but I put prefer the flash under the camera.
So a direct hit!
