My Philips Nose Trimmer I only conveyed into the garbage because he just refuses to work. The (likely) Contact problem is described on the Philips site manigfaltig and I really can only confirm this annoyance. Therefore, I have now ordered as an alternative to Remington NE3350. From the size and construction, Remington and Philips are very similar. It is worth noting, however, that the Philips only has a central blade while the Remington has two blades (left and right). The average power is thus noticeably better. Individual hairs are better captured. I use the blades for every need and do not need the special nose trimmer attachment. Had already other devices of this type and that worked all unsatisfactory. The blades are a little more open than the Philips, which means that they can be easier to clean under running water. Other reviewers complain about the sometimes off function of Remington. They certainly never held the Philips in hand. The operation is the same, but to turn the danger, the switch to far here is still much larger. Judging by Remingtion something consciously, then handling errors close actually. When Remington I have the impression that the blades are working a little faster, which on one hand brings more efficiency, but also a bit more vibration. Tickled the first time it really in the nose. Strangely, but you get used to it and now the tickling is no longer a problem. It is very positive that both devices werden.Ich operated with conventional standard batteries come several months out with a battery. I would have liked a small bag for it, so you can take it all with comfortable traveling. So everything ends up alone in the laundry bag. To store the Philips way, a detachable protective sleeve that I miss when Remington. So far, however, nothing was broken, even without the protective sleeve. In overall impression of Remington is undoubtedly the better device. It cuts much better, a little better to use and above all more reliable.