Also have a thread found but this should not be a problem because the seam else looks good and otherwise I could find no other fault with one try and drüberschauen shortly.
The pants also falls into my eyes from quite long.
Why now only 4 stars?
Because you have to write the size chart, although a lot of trouble, but really just confuse them.
I have otherwise always XL, really at all what I have so very rare, if it fails larger sometimes a L.
After the size chart but even XXL would have been a bit short (considering my other pants 49cm), because I would like it for fishing and photography and in the colder months, surely something would Including drawing, I thought then have after the given mass, the XXXL indeed be the right choice ... none ... that is definitely vieeeel too large.
The point that these measurements is that they do not take into account the trousers at size XXXL expands definitely down to about 55-56 cm Bund (half circumference) (51 cm are given). This stretch will certainly vary depending on the size of something, but I think then probably my XL as usual fit.
Since my pants has otherwise quite well-liked, and also a rather robust impression makes on me, I send back to the Big Hole and me in XL. Have with my wife all the time measured way and that, according to the specified dimensions would be the XL clearly too small, but with the stretching I'm coming back to 50cm, which should then also for what rich underneath. And man would indeed not only back and forth, but also wear the pants).
As someone already wrote here, you can relatively safely size with ca. 2-3 cm take less Confederation (half circumference) as are specified in the size.
I hope now that fits me properly XL because my pants otherwise really good, especially for my purposes like.
Should something to report or rectify be when the new is here, so I'll do it.
Apart from the somewhat confusing size problem and I indeed once had on and could see me, I can recommend the pants probably already. Power for me seems robust and seems quite comfortable to wear.
The many pockets are useful for outdoor hobby definitely :)
lG. Bacci
Addendum 30.09.2014:
the new pants in XL arrived today, have even there still air on the waistband and a little long, it is for me at 1.81cm size also, but otherwise sits well and I'm satisfied.
The quality I find very good for the price, is comfortable for me, and so I think one can safely recommend the pants when you have found the right size for yourself.
lG.bacci