Two LG to Samsung and a chance loose Vileda

After the surprisingly good experience with the Samsung VCR8849T3K / XEG NaviBot SR8849 vacuum cleaner robot and the disappointing performance of the Vileda 142861 Relax robotic vacuum I could now test the Nobel variant of LG, namely the VR6270LVMB. This is basically the already present also for Christmas in our household in use LG - VR6260LV - ASPIRAPOLVERE ricaricabile 2 Telecamere ROSSO SMART DIAGNOSIS VARI ACCESSORI RICARIC with the additional mop function.

The 6270 does a good job! Although the intrinsic values ​​should basically be identical to the Italian speaking part of 6260, it is nevertheless striking that the 6270 goes to be seen oriented works. The weaker-equipped LG we have seen no big recognition function. In other words, he fell again and again in the same pitfalls.
This is the 6270 not so easily into the trap and yes, it seems to be so that he actually recognizes certain obstacles. This may be due to the fact that the for almost half a year with us in use is LG 6260 has not yet received a new software update, here are the collisions with even older firmware versions have been more dramatic.
Whether Samsung or LG's two, one may not all: excessive carpets. The Vileda I suppose at this point out, because he already plays some classes below and according to the manufacturer is not suitable for carpets.
If the angle is low and the area is free, all the robots are clearly trying to go on the carpet.
However, when turning or when the robot moves to the carpet edge in a very acute angle, so it may happen that he loses his grip and an error message output if it does not come free quickly from the situation.
Even cable, particularly thin, such as USB charging cable, for example, do not like all three robots. Here, the Samsung is equipped with a technology that will make it particularly suitable, with Kabelage or carpet fringes to cope.
Both do not like the Samsung and I mentioned it because here make better figure in a direct comparison of both robots LG. If the Samsung whining are on the fringes, as the two draw LGs continue their orbits.
The suction power can be classified as equally well on all devices. The Vileda I take will also turn from the comparison, he had still like the occasional crumbs lying and was already broken after a few weeks.
When comparing the suction devices of Samsung and LG are on par, but one is very clear in the operation: the noise.
Is it possible for devices from LG easily lead his conversation undisturbed, yet the Samsung is clearly noisier to work.
No, the sound is then too nasty and allowed to rather run when you go shopping.
The crash test have passed all three robots. By that I mean the crash prevention and no intact body after the crash.

For maintenance, one can say that with the devices of LG the dust container is housed under the cover on the top and the Samsung semicircle at the back. Both versions can be emptied easily, without the need to break the fingers.
When cleaning the bottom, it looks like. Wrapped hair can be removed without much Gefummele the counterparties. The attached tool is an assist in doubt, but with the vacuum cleaner and two fingers to get actually getting out.

A big plus goes to the devices from LG for the lithium battery. It allows one, however briefly to use the robot, for example, after breakfast, when little time remains to remove the crumbs and then send back to the charging station without abdominal pain.
The NiMH battery of Samsung would like to thank a lot of small bets with the battery inertia effect, which has similar effects as before the memory effect.
In any case, the Samsung should be used from time to time until he looks for the way to the charging station itself.
The search function of the charging station works significantly better with the LG devices. Samsung noted that it runs out of juice appear to be off the collision warning and he often frightening bummst on chair and table legs.
The LGs are looking quite relaxed their station and see this even if no direct Coming from three meters or more is possible.
The maximum service life is very much dependent on the floor covering. Smooth surfaces hardly drain the battery, carpets, especially not short pile increase the battery consumption immensely. Permanently be expected under such conditions of an operating time of 60 minutes. When Samsung 45th

Build quality is excellent with the devices from LG, including the 6270. This is when the Samsung device also the case, however, especially in direct comparison it is clear that at LG higher quality plastics have been installed and the total units of LG "noble" act.
And I want to emphasize that the device from Samsung also makes fine figure here.

Conclusion:
The unit of Vileda falls from the comparison because it is simply furnished much too weak for the price.
The VR6270LVMB, at issue here is, well equipped and does a good job. Contrary to what its Samsung looking for the charging station, the LG collides extremely rare with furniture, unless these do not exceed the height of about 2 cm. For then the LG is trying to overcome the obstacle, but also noted surprising if this is not possible and try to get out of the problematic situation.
The suction power is not better than any other devices that I was allowed to test the LG. Except here perhaps the Vorwerk Kobold, who, however, only marginally better sucks, but once again is significantly more expensive, is not equipped with a lithium battery.

You get here so for the money an excellent product, which leaves nothing to be desired.
Who the price is too high, I recommend the Samsung NaviBot, which I bought in January and for which I have submitted a review.
5 Stars