The load capacity of the scale is specified with max 150 kg; Body sizes up to 220 cm can be recorded.
At the beginning it captured his personal data (height, age, gender, activity level). There are ten profiles; that should be enough for most families. Before weighing one chooses his profile, waiting for the display of data and then increases barefoot on the scale. After a short time the weight and the body fat percentage, water percentage, muscle percentage and the BMI only be displayed.
After the very first weighing about half a kilo of excess indicated (and vigorously creaked when climbing plan), then the weighing results were in the range of +/- 0.2 kg, and also agree (at least approximately) with the results of my Soehnle scale (Soehnle 63350 pwd Pharo 200 Analytic) agreement, which I had placed next to it for comparison.
But now for the diagnosis: The BMI is more accurately to calculate on the basis of collected data and the weight, so he agreed with both devices. Consider me the Söhnle however as linnet, sees the Sanitas in me a true muscleman. Dried I am "in the eyes" of both equipment. The statement of consideration here Sanitas-balance to my body fat is much more flattering.
Since I do not know what now determined or calculated the two scales the correct values, I prefer this from any points. But some caution basically comfortable with such values, for me they are an indication. And as such should also be sufficiently meaningful changes, as long as you always measure with the same device.
