After Mueller, Amateur, Leibniz, Athanasius and many other comments very, very sharp and complete, I'd settle for some remarks without returning to the story itself. - With his talent and such an explosive theme, Houellebecq could have easily let go and stand with one hundred pages plus.S'est he retained frightened by his own audacity? Too bad I did not find it sufficiently developed including the submission of the media elite ... identity and FN are also reduced in their response (or resistance?) To the bare minimum. - The writing in the first person obviously limits this development: everything is experienced through the eyes and ears of the university self-centered and depressed. I can not help but make the comparison with the Camp of the Saints by Jean Raspail where the author shows the cowardice of elites fleeing in fear yet the disaster they have called their criminogenic vows with finesse and jouissives cruelty unnamed while Houellebecq abuse of the process of "name dropping" .There MH avoids this research work in speeches and editorials of the political-media class, those who have flattered Islam and encouraged the change of people .Pourtant with internet one can find in one click those which put us in a state of submission.
