Very good picture, good 3D, but reflects very strong

I have previously "used by LG and temporarily a 55" mainly a 42 by Philips. For both me, the lame software more than annoyed, but the Philips has an eternity needed until it was turned on and has responded to inputs.
Therefore, my main reason to buy was a good software, and of course the image.
I have now searched about half a year after my TV, yet still have also taken LG under the microscope. Unfortunately, LG has apparently general problem with the sluggish software, Philips we do not need to start. What I use a super picture and Ambilight great if I can disengage the operation.
So ultimately remained only Samsung and Sony left here for me but has gained from the image Sony. Especially as Samsung partially has lame software.
So I opted for the Sony.

What surprised me even initially, the TV is surprisingly light. And the design is great, albeit with deductions. I like the narrow edge very good, but unfortunately the TV does not swivel still tilted due to the pedestal. But it is safe because the pedestal has partly a rubber coating.

The commissioning is very fast, facility incl. Station search was done in under twenty minutes. As picture settings I have the recommendation adopted the published here one reviewer, I copy times by this review directly as the first comment.
The speed? A Dream! Unlike LG and Philips everything works here quickly and without delay. Ok, even at power consumption of the Sony a few seconds, but there are worlds which are between Sony and LG / Philips.
Where there are delays, is in the multimedia content. Here there is significant input delays but pending on the network provider, which I think at least.
What I find is a pity that the TV without an integrated browser has, I can only get apps or provide the content that the channels available.

A nice gimmick which I did not want to do without was 3D. However, I wanted rather the passive 3D technology, because I do not want to have to buy the expensive glasses, or having to change the batteries all the long nose. But since now the active 3D technology is much more widespread I have accepted, and has been here even a pleasant surprise.
Firstly, two pairs of glasses are included with the Sony, and second, the become really easy and you can tell them almost to which they are battery-powered.
The 3D feeling is very good, though depending on the viewed 3D material.

The only really annoying downside conceded the Sony for the display, because unfortunately this is reflected very strong. Here I have definitely not paying attention, because that would have been a criterion which is why I would have to buy reconsidered. But well, the child has fallen into the well, and that reflect the annoying, but there are one or the other way restrict.
Because otherwise the Sony is really a stunner, especially a real price-performance hit.

If you want to know something or I should give it a try for yourself, simply use the comment function :-)