(Before the Moto G 2nd Edition I have the Moto G, the Samsung Galaxy S4, the Samsung Galaxy S5, the Samsung Galaxy Mega 6.3, the Samsung Galaxy Note 2, the Samsung Ativ S, the LG G3, the LG Optimus 4X HD , the LG G Pro, the HTC One M7, the HTC Desire 816, the Huawei Ascend P6, the Huawei Ascend P7, the Huawei Ascend G750, the BlackBerry Q10, Sony Xperia Z1, Sony Xperia Z2 and the Sony Xperia Ultra possessed the or tested.)
Processing:
The housing is made as well as its predecessor completely made of polycarbonate, although there is no feeling of a cheap product. The workmanship is very good, the gaps are even and the volume rocker and the unlock key have an excellent tactile feedback. Overall, the processing with the predecessor is on par.
Ease of use:
The dimensions of the new Moto G has grown in comparison to the first version, although the new Moto G is not unahndlich, and the frame around the display is quite thin. The One-handed Bedinung is still possible, but become a little more difficult. Thanks to the slightly rubberized back, the device fits comfortably in your hand.
The Abemessungen compared:
Moto G (1st Edition) - 129.9 x 65.9 x 11.6
Moto G (2nd Edition) - 140.8 x 72.4 x 10
Display:
The display of the Moto G (2nd Edition) is still very bright and readable even in direct sunlight. The sharpness is perfectly adequate and the price is reasonable. Compared to the first version, the screen brightness higher and the system of automatic brightness is significantly better. Only the pixel density (PPI) is slightly lower, but what you can not see with the naked eye. All in all, I would because of the higher brightness and the size prefer the display of the Moto G (2nd Edition).
Performance:
The performance is really very good, thanks to the almost pure Androids. Some much more expensive devices have here and there small stuttering, which you can find models for any of the Moto G. Although you should expect from a Snapdragon 400 no high-end performance. While games like Real Racing 3 run smoothly, but not at the maximum graphics settings, which should be due to the weak Adreno GPU.
For the price, the performance is very satisfactory for both versions.
Camera:
The camera was what was now resolved for me in the first version of the Moto G one of the biggest criticisms. Instead of 5-megapixel camera of the Moto G (2nd Edition) now has a resolution of 8 megapixels. The images are much sharper than its predecessor, and also focusing faster.
Macro shots succeed much faster with the Moto G (2nd Edition), the result is very sharp and detailed. In Lowlight area both devices have typical smartphone weaknesses as noise and insufficient exposure. The camera software offers many settings (ISO, HDR images, exposure, self-timer, panorama mode, etc ...).
Overall, the camera of the new Moto G is ideal for everyday use and in terms of price in order.
Battery:
The battery is the same size or small as its predecessor namely 2070 mAh. However, if you consider that the display has grown from 4.5 to 5.0 inches, one wonders why the battery has not grown. In addition, the display brightness is higher, which also consumes the battery. Overall, the battery life is less than its predecessor, but to get so just over a day. The Moto G (1st Edition) I have the evening mostly had a residual charge of approximately 20%, the new Moto G, however, is about 5%.
Conclusion:
All in all, the Moto G (2nd Edition) equal to his predecessor.
What has changed, the camera and the screen size, but has deteriorated for the battery life and handling.
The changeover from the old to the new Moto G is only worthwhile if you value a better camera and a larger screen, besides that the overall performance is equally good.
You should also include in its decision that only the Moto G (2nd Edition) dual SIM capable. (What I unfortunately could not test themselves so far)
If you have any questions about the Moto G (2nd Edition) I will answer you this like in the comments. Also, I would appreciate feedback on my review.