Another - of course very subjective impression - is the smell. Not pushy, tendency to classic Nivea scent.
Whether the cream has an anti-aging effect, I can just as little as a verified anti-wrinkle effect.
It feels good, soothes the conscience and that is in the price league also what you would expect.
Why the point-deduction?
Although I am not ingredient-critic and expect at Nivea no organic or eco products, but a clear identification of ingredients on the product page I's criticisms actually. If you want to avoid certain ingredients has, if he does not inform on other platforms to meet any possible decisions if he opts for or against a product. As a reviewer, I do not see myself in the obligation reciting ingredients (I see that even now questionable, because manufacturers have their recipes also can change times and then have such information not last longer), for a binding statement on this you should probably hopefully by the provider may demand details / manufacturer.
So much perhaps to the Nivea Cellular Anti-Age Eye Care: Silicone-free is not the cream.
The ingredients that are probably responsible for the SPF, give me when they come into the eye, massive problems.
Even if I apply the cream gently and wisely I avoid certain creams such as before Motorradtouren now wisely because the cream also passes through welding or minimal breeze times in the eye or mucous membranes and usually ends in a relatively uncontrolled tearing that can at many everyday opportunities may times with his handkerchief get quickly under control, but in certain activities, such an option has not. I know as far unproblematic creams, where that does not happen.
PS. If the review has fallen / help, I would appreciate an evaluation very. In this way, to know whether the effort has paid off the reviewer. Thank-You! ;-)