Here are the details:
The Remington AC9096 Silk Hairdryer has minimal 1850 watts to a maximum of 2,400 Watt, two speed settings and three heat settings, including a real cold stage and the silk protein-ceramic ring. The cable is 310 cm long, it weighs 812 grams without attachment.
The Remington AC5011 ion hairdryer Pearl has 2,200 watts. He also has three heating (including a cold) and two speed settings. It also has the Pearl ceramic ring. The cable is 300 cm long, it weighs 803 grams without attachment.
The 2,400 watt hairdryer is quieter on both speed settings, as the 2,200 watt device. When you connect the turbo level the same volume is approached. This impression is, of course subjectively colored, since I can not compete with decibels. The sound of the 2,200-watt dryer is higher, shriller and is perceived by me as an unpleasant, rather than a humming resembling, darker sound of the 2,400 watt device.
The air stream is at 2200 watts drier hotter on the two stages, as the 2400 Watt device. Even if the Turbo is switched on, the temperature is still Noticeably smaller than in the comparison unit level 2.
The Remington AC9096 Silk hairdryer is due to a frosted handle bar securely in your hand. All buttons are easy to operate with your thumb. My ample shoulder length hair has a beautiful shine after blow-drying and is antistatic.
My question concerning the difference between silk protein-ceramic ring and Pearl Ceramic Ring unfortunately could me in Remigton-Service Center do not answer, so I can not comment to the mode of action of the two rings.
Conclusion:
At the same price of the Remington AC9096 Silk hairdryer I think is the better choice because it dries the hair more gently and the turbo air flow reduces the drying time due to low heat.