The feminist struggle has much to do with a vision of the world more sentimental, naive and cunning conveying the idea of a change, a route alternative. Just as a president "black" does not change a policy that must maintain its own power, a female society or a woman president can overturn an order of values established for centuries. Need we recall that the nests of feminism form in the most industrialized Western societies where paradoxically the living conditions of women, but of the individual in general, are less to be pitied? Feminism is based on an outcome of a privileged class ideology such petty bourgeoisie - Simone Beauvoir was the spokesman at the time - obscuring that it claims to defend may be his worst enemy. And low overall strategic vision of a minority class forgetting that the emancipated woman of maternal stress by giving his children to a nurse, it becomes its own contradiction oppressor. Is not feminist who wants. Similarly, the sex of a man or woman CEO (the famous glass ceiling) does nothing upsets the codes of a society based on any economic power and its laws of intractable market. Under the banner of liberating feminism actually seen how power has put in place a stupid ideology, real smokescreen of the political field which over the decades has managed to divide men and women, transforming the class struggle in battle of the sexes in a game without interest and possible victory. For better understanding, in his book Propaganda, Bernays expertly demonstrates how, during the 20s, the woman was exploited to endorse a state liberalism under cover of a progressive emancipation. The woman or manipulated eternal ...
Well, that's a bit all these contradictions are identified and carefully removed in this book that proves a powerful dialectical weapon against feminist utopia, its bourgeois ideology, its Stalinist rhetoric. Soral puts things here for them in a fight where the man and woman have nothing to gain.
