So I was expecting something innovative, sparkling, but I leave with a feeling of big dud. Sure "Those we love" is not "A two", but the style and creativity, a priori, should, overall, remain the same, right?
In style and narration, I had the impression of reading a Harlan Coben (but good), very civilized, very clean on him, even politically correct. Too bad in this story Mosby was room for unpin literary grenade that would have blown the clichés of the genre and make his novel a little surprising ... Instead, we propose that the classic: the gentiles are ( a little too well), and the bad guys also have quite unhinged their place in HP ... well nothing I did not already know.
Besides that, I noticed a very large inconsistency in the story that unfortunately I can not reveal without attacking the integrity of the plot ...
However, I noticed something particularly interesting about this book is the commitment of the author to the reader to reflect, not on the survey / plot, but on social issues: guilt ( in the reflection of Currie on the death of his son) and in our report in full distension with others while paradoxically stuffed ourselves with tools that should prevent this relaxation ... So if the debate is not new (and although through its uncouth characters, these questions remain open) allowing, through a thriller, to remember some social thoughts is an approach that I find particularly relevant.