Good multiplayer, disappointing campaign

All in all I'd Battlefield 3 described as very good game. But of course there's also negative points:
- Very short campaign that has me (especially in contrast to the two Bad Companies and various Call of Duty's) not blown away. All very linear, hardly own choices
- EA's very own understanding of Privacy (only applies to PC gamers, I personally am XBox gamers - had> luck :)
They are actually so my two points that bother me much. I mean, I had on a campaign (!) By night (3-4 hours) ...

Positives:
- Very good graphics, crazy Engine! I do not understand the people who give this 1 star and complain about the graphics. Neither XBox 360 still PS 3 are the latest consoles on the market, but the game looks really great. Do not know what some people expect here ... ne 6 years old console. On PC the whole story again provides, from horny to homes !!! Therefore: Please hurry up with the Xbox 720 :)
- Multiplayer: am relatively new in the multiplayer Gezocke but Battlefield 3 seems to me like a successful start. It's exciting, fast (is true that sometimes you have to walk a bit far until NEM respawn is back in action, but then it'll definitely be back neatly from) and loud. The engine uses also the multiplayer super and proves that you have to get there first time Frostbite 2.

Overall, I really seh a some of the bad reviews, but I think that the game has ratings under 4 stars is actually nevertheless not deserve. Can compared to MW3 Unfortunately not say anything because I have not yet gambled, but I think that both games have their pros and cons and in coexistence (more or less) can live alongside peacefully.