No substitute for a DSLR with a good lens, but nice camera

On the web there are many more or less objective and useful tests, of which I have read almost all to make me a picture of this camera (especially compared to SONY RX 10). Personally, I have decided on the Panasonic, but not because the Sony would be worse. The idea of ​​being able to replace a mid-range DSLR with a good lens, you should not come anyway easily. The skin just not go. If you have no special requirements, especially in the field of indoor photography without a flash, you can be happy with two cameras. For the really little to do. It comes easily to down to personal preference. I would have no reasonable DSLR equipment, I would probably grab even to Sony, because I find the bright lens better. The Sony wikt also significantly valent and a DSLR like. Since I'm already well equipped and only a flexible supplement was looking for (for outside use), I reached for Panasonic with better telephoto. Unfortunately, the beginning of Aperture 2.8 is held only briefly, the F-number is quickly clear up. The autofocus is world-class and better than the SONY. All in all I think you have to not be so worry, as I have done it. Both cameras are on par total. They are much better than what a smaller sensor, but also (in tricky lighting situations) significantly worse than APSC cameras with powerful lens. Hope to have helped.