First the positives:
- Very persistent Battery
- Beautiful design, similar to the Samsung Galaxy models lies comfortably in the hand
- Display resolution no HD, but for 5 "sufficient
- Seems to be stable, no crashes in the test phase
- Passable price / performance ratio (if you do not the negative points as no-go looks)
Negatives:
- No viewing angle stable IPS display
- Contrast is relatively weak (but falls without direct comparison with better display hardly on)
- Lame Dual Core (older generation, newer Mediatek dual cores are about 50% faster at the same clock)
- Therefore: Operation not really liquid, the outdated CPU tinkers at the limits of their capabilities
- Memory (512MB + 4GB) is tight
- Lousy camera (for me but unimportant)
All this would have been to get over with an inexpensive smartphone yet - but a joke is the built-in GPS. I had the opportunity to compare it with five other smartphones (a Samsung, four noname-China mobile phones of similar size). The DG300 cuts from catastrophic: the App GPS test, which ran simultaneously on all devices, provided the Dogee by far the worst result and in practical tests it failed completely. Only after 20 minutes (!) Highway driving position determination was possible and in town was the location so inaccurate (if the reception is not even broke), that a navigation proved to be completely impossible. An absolute no-go, because the smart phone to replace the old Navi for us.
Conclusion:
Who navigation to the smartphone does not matter, can pick up the DG300. However, it should even be clear to everyone that this is a fairly outdated model. For the same money or a little extra charge you get now much (!) More powerful Noname Smarthones. Example: Cubot S208 (also 5 "faster quad-core, IPS display, USB OTG, functioning GPS and 1 + 16GB Memory for just 20-30 euros extra for DG300), it even has the price / performance win at chinahandys.net cleared. By contrast, the Dogee looks DG300 (also by this company way, there is more recent models) pretty old from.