What can the Chromecast, is already elsewhere. Drum I limit time on how well he can do it. I use it with a LG G3 (2569x1440 pixels) and a Lenovo Yoga8 (1280x800 pixels) on a Samsung 46-inch monitor with Full HD (1920x1080 pixels). First and foremost I want to stream with the Chromecast movies on my TV. Vorneweg, the films are shown on both the tablet and on your smartphone liquid. From Yoga of the films are played cleanly, from the G3 from jerky powerful. For this, I could imagine me two reasons: The Chromecast has no problem with the low resolution of yoga on FullHD extrapolate but when trying resolutions higher than FullHD down attributed (as from G3) goes to him out of steam. If the hardware may specialize only on upscaling? Possibility Two: The amount of data that comes from a high-resolution display, such as the the G3 is for 2.4GHz WLAN (no other band is supported) too large. Here I can only hope that Google improves the interaction of Android devices and the Chromecast. The pixel numbers of tablets and smartphones continue to rise so (the current Nexus devices are already on FullHD). The resolution could for example be already adapted to the Android device to the TV which both the computational effort for the Chromecast as well as the amount of data that would have to reduce over the WLAN. To make the TV with a slideshow of your own Google account for digital photo frame is a nice feature in itself. Unfortunately shows the Chromecast the images in highly compressed version with significant artifacts on - nice is different. And one way to present the images without overlays would not be bad. Other content that is not 25 times per second change in how films are shown properly but are actually rather useful only if someone in which to watch what I'm doing on the Android device via touchscreen. Because even with the keyboard and mouse via BT is from an Android device, no PC - even if the display is not as big. In short, the possibilities are there but the implementation seems still immature in my eyes.
