First the positives:
The bottle is visually chic, fits comfortably in your hand and in the delivery are two possible closures with different system for pouring (this point indication - see negative characteristics). The price of the can is also considerably lower than that of competitors models.
Neutral Features: The top cover is how to use most common as a cup. The isolation period is better than insulated thermos flasks but noticeably worse than the old Stanley. After about 4-5 hours I get an acceptable hot drink, which I definitely no longer need to blow. After more than 6 hours of any content is only still warm. Since the bottle was more favorable than the old one, I can live with it.
Negative characteristics:
I think the weak point of the thermos is in the two closures. To this end, I explain first the functioning of the two closures:
The first closure was known to me from my Stanley in the basic function. Above, respectively, an arrow is attached to the opposite sides. To pour the closure will last about 1 1/2 turns psyched (feeling thing) and then is poured on the arrows down. Not really clean but ok. The second closure is to be a comfort closure, which when viewed from above aufweisst two rings. For pouring press the center ring around the seal is pushed down to lock. After pouring press the outer ring around the shutter to close again. In this process, there is always an ordinary injection molding plant of coffee is still in the lock. So I have my place to push the inner habit by pressing the outer ring. This prevents a "snapping" of the closure, avoiding the syringes; However, I must then pour the remaining coffee of the closure. I suspect also that the temperature loss caused by the cheap-looking locks. Both closures are noticeably smaller and lighter than its predecessor. Here a practical and for better insulating closure would have been really meaningful than the two which are now included. Especially the closure with the comfort function caused by his "Restbehalt" also repeatedly small dirty tricks. I think this is in a pot for the purpose of outdoor use frankly already pathetic; my backpack can confirm this.
Conclusion: price / performance is in total alright. Through minor modifications here liese a jug of the stuff for 5 * manufacture. If the manufacturer would nachproduzieren reasonable closure, then I could give the missing star for closure and tightness even.
