Not bad - no more than that ...

I use Veet creams quite a while. I've tried several varieties. In all creams I have to say: The advertising promises more than the cream holds - at least in my case. I have dark hair and relatively fair skin. So my hair is quickly visible. - I always buy otherwise normal Veet depilatory cream-. A few days ago I looked at the "Veet Hair Removal Cream Suprem'Essence" ordered to test it.

The first thing I noticed was: In the Tube are only 90ml (100ml instead, as with the other Veet creams) in it. But the price is about twice as high. ;-) In my case, a tube for just 1-2 hair removal (legs, underarms, bikini line) is sufficient.
The application went well and without any problems. However, as with other creams also supplied the filler is of limited use for me. The uneven body parts (eg underarms) can be so difficult to achieve. I applied the cream with your fingers and hands washed thoroughly immediately. Thus, the product was better and especially more targeted application.
According to advertising the product is "to velvety Rose" smell. Well, I guess that the developers of Veet have never been in a real rose garden. ;-) I'd rather the scent, getting used to call the perfume-like, artificial-flowery, sometimes very intense. But in this respect I am not very sensitive, so it did not bother me.
The dehairing was, compared to other Veet creams, no worse - but not much better. Immediately after depilation are in all areas very little noticeable stubble (not visible). I'd "cotton test" not definitely exist, however. ;-) After 2-3 days you can already see here and there regrowth.
The hair is not completely removed: remain in my case always vereinzelnt back hair, of which I know that they were treated with the cream.
This cream can be showered a little worse than other Veet products. I suspect it is there the oils.

My conclusion: Compared to the normal hair removal cream Veet I look at this no advantage (higher price, less content, the same dehairing). Therefore, I would prefer the normal cream, for that reason alone because it is cheaper.