A really decent homemade indoor vacuum cleaner with 750 watts of power for a in terms of performance rather reasonable price (compared to other models of this manufacturer is the RO 2321 even very cheap). Whether such a device or the resulting effective and subjectively "cleaner" vacuuming is worth this price, I can tell, which is why I will not go in the wake intensively on the "value" as free testers hardly. But the fact is that I have already bought specifically Rowenta devices (also vacuum cleaner, but for example also hairdryers), because here the quality compared to the price is always right. Total convinced me in direct comparison to a much more expensive "armed bandits" (Stand or only canister vacuum cleaner) azs the "Air Force" series, which does not require dust bag, and a AEG and Grundig a China-device significantly better suction , Rowenta provides here from devices that can shine regularly against comparable devices of competitors in the "lower" price segment between 100 and 200 euros. On top of that you with this "trunk suckers" and its anther one hand (through the bag) less "Crap, I need to wipe" problems has emptying, for a total comfort comes when emptying them and on the other not (we in the "one-armed" ) is fixed so completely on vacuuming floors. The usual problems with such devices with corners, edges, sucking on couches, under the ceiling, for example, accounts in the car and it is thus not so completely to a use (just floor vacuuming) limited. It strikes me as an example another that one is mostly metaphorically with "one-armed" with no tube present thereon, if, for example trying to make under cabinets for cleanliness. The rigid "one-armed" come here usually no more than ten centimeters - with a "hose-sucker" to get some up behind the cupboard. Dito in any situation where you would need only the hose: eg when drilling into a wall. A "one-armed" here comes to its limits and brings a nothing at all - to the tube without attachment is a great place any drilling dust equal wicking during drilling. You remember: I can come out at this point only as a fan of the device class "proboscis sucker"; although I really can not do much with anthers, as they always have for me the appearance of "Allergy-trap". On the other hand filters a dust bag significantly better fine particles out and needs (cleaned with water = for example) not cumbersome maintained in order to remain operational. This looks at bagless vacuums already quite different. Here is nursing the alpha and omega Finally, briefly set on the technical characteristics: I find that wattage, carpet cleaning classes and energy efficiency are overrated at this point. It is important for me that a vacuum cleaner reliably does what I expect of him sucking. Whether a manufacturer now 750 watts or 1000 watts writes off, which makes the suction power no better. Here it comes in my experience always depends on what is done from the "x" Watt. Rowenta is doing well - other manufacturers make a mad, because you're looking for the reason that the devices have felt no suction ... until then noted that this should be so. Especially in China devices with the acquired brand name I would also rather cautious when it comes to reviews, such manufacturers give in relation to the performance itself. Moreover, I submit that one can not really differ from the specified performance between manufacturers A, B and C. To this end, it would take rather a consistent comparison across Stiftung Warentest or another, totally independent service. In Conclusion: Who call the shots with dust bag not subjectively "environmentally unfriendly" occurs, which is well served with this unit. Just allergies may even anther to (if full) "dust distributors" Bagless prefer. In terms of durability have in our household vacuum cleaner from Rowenta despite some bad Misuse (children, building dust, sand pit, ....) and the slope for cleaning to dismantle the equipment sometimes completely, always held the longest. Therefore 4 stars with an upward trend.
By the way, matching anthers are ... Wonderbag Compact Spare dust bag WB3051 and Swirl spare dust bags: Y30m.
Final Note of our own: This review was set by me in corrected form again because it - typed on my phone - accurate, but (thanks to the "T9" successor of Samsung) was grammatically incorrect. If you should find misspellings, so goes a short comment and I'll change.