"Very good" I find:
the processing of the device. Bresser shows its particular strength. Everything is processed accurately and cleanly. The Stereo magnifying glass could from pure external ago, are also in many laboratories.
"Well," I find:
the different types of lighting. The transport packaging. Everything was packed securely in a case made of Styrofoam. Everything has its place. I'm sure that even small resistant to shocks, during transport, the device would not mind. The stability of the unit. Children are indeed no filigree technicians but (unfortunately) often Grobmotoriker. This device is solid and heavy enough even inadvertent (mis) treatment to survive unscathed.
"Orderly" I find: The pure power of magnification stereo magnifier.
"Poor" I think: It is NOT supplied suitcases or offered another safe space. An absurdity, no nerve! About this fact I am really angry. In a child's room is just not 24 hours a day and then experimented .... ??? Now the styrofoam packaging has to serve as a repository, a joke! Even after a year in use still an annoyance. My fear has unfortunately fully materialized here. For the lack of opportunity for safe keeping a well-deserved star remains deduction.
Note: Bresser operates unnecessary misnomer here. Either one is a stereo magnifying glass or a microscope. For my son, and I think for children experimenting a stereo magnifying glass is actually a lot better than it ever could be a pure microscope. But Bresser should then this device also named what it is. Because the only way to avoid misunderstandings.
