The double standards of the so-called games Press 1

It is incredible that a game nowadays is no longer assessed in relation to what it wants to be and what it is. No, a game is rated according to what it has to be very please. In the case of The Order 1886, shows this clearly. And that's more than sad, but more on that later. What's The Order 1886 because now for a game?

The game was announced to play and experience as an interactive movie for himself from the development studio from the beginning. To enhance the film character, the game has not suppressible black PAL beams, over which one can argue like. My personal opinion is that they definitely help in this case (unlike the game "The Evil Within") to the atmosphere.

STORY:
Finally, a fresh scenario: Steampunk Victorian London. Werewolves, the Knights of the Round Table and a Dukle conspiracy.

GAMEPLAY:
In principle, the game consists of three sections:

1. cutscenes / Story
2. Quick-Time Events
3. Third Person Shooter coverage a la "Gears of War"

All three elements go here seamlessly over and merge into a truly incredible gaming experience, to which we must simply get involved. And without false expectations that never fomented the development studio!

GRAPHICS:
I think the photos speak for themselves. Here the PS4 is all their power.

SOUND:
Sounds on a good facility and rattles all at a high level. On top of that really every game section is perfectly set in sound and music. The atmosphere that produces the sound with the beautiful scenes of the game is incredibly dense.

Playing time:
Yes, what have not all torn mouth. The game is too short, you can play it, etc., etc. in 4 hours.
On the highest difficulty I needed to complete the game to finish Felt 9-10 hours. I took my time, looked around and enjoyed the game. Who has a faster style of play, which will be probably faster by. As the credits rolled, I felt, however, by no means taken by surprise by the end, on the contrary. Yes, the game ends with a cliffhanger: SURPRISE, what game these days does not do this?

HANDLING THE "GAMES PRESS" WITH THE ORDER 1886:
I dedicate this issue a special section. Why? Because I sometimes think it's a joke, was how to deal with this game in advance. We live in a game landscape that almost exclusively relies on well-tried and sometimes even getting the same performance pattern used (the best example of Assassins Creed, baptized game elements have now found their way into almost every Ubisoft game whose "Ubisoft formula".) This will, however, never heard of the established gaming press negatively rated the contrary formulaic games, you almost have to look with a magnifying glass, the changes in the latest offshoots, collect regularly votes rarely below 80! At the same time repeatedly stressed how much the major development studios should abgucken times more of the riskier indie developers in terms of new game concepts and new narrative styles. It is verlagt clamoring for something new and fresh and innovative and the latest Call of Duty, Assassin's Creed, etc. assessed at the same year after year high: The double standard says hello!
Then a game like The Order in 1886 and power comes something else. No, it's not innovative. Yes, you have seen them before all game elements. But the connection of all this, the Art Design and the story, the setting: All of which brings more fresh air into the games landscape as each new annual Call of Duty and how it does not mean all. And the Games Press to write sore fingers and devalues ​​for things that should be the game never. What's next in a time when seemingly no play longer has a right to exist, for example when it is not set to OpenWorld?

The handling of some reviewers should be thinking about here and elsewhere:
"Have the Game Platinum in two hours lool"
"More than 5 Euros, it is anyway not worth"

You want new ideas, new games? Thanks Sony on their knees, they still put money and effort into those projects, take risks in order to establish new brands. Of these, many others have long since adopted namely. I very much hope that this game sold extremely well, a successor justifies and Sony shows that it is worth the effort. That people are grateful for such ideas.

And if not? Well, then there is every year a new "Open World, character Auflevel, shooting adventure, multiplayer coop" game. 85/100 of course!
Welcome to the stupidity ... Think about it!