Who weeds in the garden, has a problem: shading, nutrient deficiency, cheap seed, lawn thatch or whatever. This issue needs to be eliminated. Using a weed killer, only the symptoms are combated. This makes no sense! Who ordered fertilizer for 1000sqm surface, gets a good Scarifier for the price !!! Herewith the lawn every year in April / May should be treated to remove the thatch and soil compaction, which the weed growth restrains. Who for some reason can not always solve the problem, which should not use a combination product containing a fertilizer, which is just as bad as cheap products for the rest, go ahead. Against weeds are effective insecticides available that dosed better, so can be sprayed only on the weeds and not the entire lawn. In addition, this is the much cheaper alternative. And now for fertilizer is indeed included here nor there: it is a mineral fertilizer after my Austestungen (I already tested several of Wolf) is just as bad as any cheap product. After a few weeks the grass is yellow again. The disadvantage of mineral fertilizers: promotes soil life not because of the fertilizer does not have to be implemented by same. Thus, the soil can be compacted faster and promote thatch. Protects not just the environment as mineral fertilizers are mined in mines, thus wasting a lot of energy and disfigure the landscape. Mineral fertilizers are washed out relatively quickly and are then gone into the ground water. In the worst case, the groundwater is used for drinking water preparation. Mineral fertilizers can cause burns to plants! In addition, there is no natural cycle here. Unlike the case of purely organic fertilizers: From plants fertilizer for plants and plant waste is recycled sense. The soil life is promoted, resulting in less thatch (humus bacteria) and less compression and to less labor (scarify) leads. So quite clearly not advise !!! For this price you get a fully organic fertilizer for 500 square meters (!) With bacteria and mycorrhizal fungi. As an alternative, I recommend the AZET lawn fertilizer Neudorff and to eliminate the problems (Alternatively, a spray). Who does not, however, shut down the problem, will soon have a new weed! Due to the previously poor rating this Review here again a summary of the most everyone understands: The fertilizers included in this product is just as bad as a low-cost product. There are weeds spray (eg from Bayer) - small bottles which are diluted with water - can be used effectively. A cheaper fertilizer and this spray is much cheaper. Alternatively, there are better (organic) fertilizer and in addition you can buy the spray. Here you are doing something for the environment and it's still cheaper and better. Maybe you have here but employees of Wolf or those who benefit from my review judged badly. If this review was helpful, I may ask this also evaluate.
Update: Based on the Kommtare is to realize that one or the other still major problems seem to have with weeds. Therefore, once a few tips: 1. Wolf lawn fertilizer with weed killer, the active ingredient 2,4-D and dicamba contained. Herewith are some problems concerning. The effectiveness as a concentrate. I would therefore time to resort to the active ingredient mecoprop-P as a concentrate. 2. weedkillers act only in periods of growth (not too hot, not too wet, not too cold, not in late summer or fall, not before the end of April). This must also be taken into account. 3. Cut the lawn not less than 5cm (!). Unfortunately believe very many lawn owners that a short lawn and weed growth is suppressed. This is definitely wrong. The lawn is not sufficiently tight and strong to displace the weeds. If it is very hot, the grass can be cut to 6cm. About a cut of at least 1 time a week, the weeds also annoyed.