As a reader, I'm really stubborn and usually read everything I have begun to end, but in this book I have not done so. Already in the first chapter, there are so many factual errors that are based on extreme inaccuracy of representation and probably the underlying thinking that I did not feel like me to acquire the still following false opinions of the author. It would be better, this author would have remained in the area of its competence, rather than without hurting on a topic for which he is unqualified simply. Incidentally, the writing style is no pleasure; linguistic imprecision that makes, among other things in strange word duplications noticeable, demonstrate that the intellectual level is not too high, in contrast to the unfounded self-confidence of the author. Better read another book on the subject.
