The part has all the facilities that you want in a wired remote release expected (specifications are indeed in the product description).
Range of functions, this part does not differ in the slightest from other (more expensive) models, and is therefore for every amateur photographer who does not constantly photographed with a remote release, more than adequate.
A few words to frequently asked questions, or comments:
- The device comes with only an English and Chinese manual. But apart from the fact that the ambitious amateur also easily find out the operation with a little try out, there are ([.....]) also a German-language video, in which the device and its features are presented extensively.
- The unit has no explicit on / off switch, but it turns off after a few seconds without input / keystroke (and unless active) by itself. Those who value a separate switch which may be necessary, this model here (ie = UTF8 & qid = 1421407299 & sr = 1-10 & keywords = JJC + fernausl% C3% B6ser) watch. I was almost 20, - more for the switch to much. Otherwise, the two devices are in fact identical.
One of the main advantages for me in this device is that it AAA batteries / accumulators working with 2 standard. And if you still use Eneloop batteries, the timer is ready to operate even after a few weeks / months in the camera bag.
A final remark to (hopefully) better / easier understanding of the operation:
What might at first use a little "surprise / surprise" is that the device quasi each mode basically combined, always from left to right. That is, if, for example. In the first (leftmost) menu item is selected a shutter lag, then this is always active, even if you really just want to make a long exposure. If you want to not have the shutter lag, you have to set it to zero again until this.
Well, now a lot of fun with the part ...!
Oh, and to get back to the original question in the title:
Wireless would be the whole thing then maybe ..., see; redirect = true & ref_ = oh_aui_detailpage_o01_s00
