Who loved the first part, also loves the second

When it comes to fear the first part of FEAR was great succeeded. At that time, with a more than smoking-hot graphics, FEAR was able to convince all the playtesters and gamers. And the AI ​​was the best that existed at the time of the first part.

The more I was happy - as an old Grafikfetischist - to the second part. After two days of testing I come to the following conclusion:

Graphics: The graphics of FEAR2 has disappointed me a little. I would not say that it is really bad, but shows compared to the first part of no progress. The environment and objects do not have that "WOW-What-for-a-graphic" effect. Admittedly, the people in the current game are much better and more fluid movements shown with. But that does not improve the first impression of the graphic.
!!!! Here, then, only 3 out of 5 points !!!!

Fun: Again, I want to take the first part of FEAR for comparison. The AI ​​of the game has not improved ... And why?!? It is and remains simply brilliant. Your opponents react and act lifelike.
!!!! 5 of 5 points !!!!

Shock Effect: Clear, with FEAR the shock effect is always given. Whether one is a sudden appearance of shape, the maimed and friend and foe surprised if it's just a blur of light, or if you completely destroy visions of Alma. Once played in the dark, like this game lets go not so fast!
!!!! 5 of 5 points !!!!

Control: you get used to the first-person shooter control the PS3, one finds it very simple and ingenious. Than is actually typical gamers first I was obsessively on my mouse and refused first-person shooter for the PS3 to buy. To all skeptics: practice makes perfect. The PS3 controller works really well.
!!!! 4 of 5 points !!!!

--------------------------------------------

Conclusion: Who the story of Alma the first part was too short, who is a fan of small batons and scary stories, who likes to play good first person shooter, the game is recommended.
But if you are looking for graphic perfection, you're better off with TombRaider.