Achachach how sad ...

So, so one thing is clear: I love Tana Frenchens books. Faithful Place was a revelation.
And so then one thing is clear: Broken Harbour it was not for me.
History weak hero pale, confusion inflated by repetitions of miniature state descriptions.
Continuously Scorcher is so tired that he is afraid that permanently suggestive in one's face
Twitches to miss shadows and eye changes or misinterpret. But more than twitching and eyes shimmer
is not somehow. Then his family history, which acts glued multiply as with tape. And not holding it.
The first third I still like to read, because Mrs French also writes very well when she writes very badly.
In the second period I was at least as fatigued as Scorcher, had convulsions and also thought paranoid to ever miss what -
somewhere must have read the real, the exciting story.
But it was not. By the last third I've dragged me like by the half-hearted examination of an innocent person.
I knew I had caught the wrong man - the wrong Roman.
Nevertheless, there were fantastic moments, playing the internet discussions about (outstanding with perfect pitch),
or Scorchers criminal philosophical reflections over evil (Wild stays out.)
But Dina and tattered books ??? Come on, that's really like off of a television series.
Thus: Would Mrs. French tomorrow publish a new book, I'd buy it immediately.
But I had read the first Broken Harbour, I would not have touched the other. Flop, I think. Can happen to anyone.
I believe in the next.