It seems to me very reliable, very responsive, no excess overlay manufacturer (we see that the acquisition of Motorola by Google has enabled a Google phone a "purity" worthy of the nexus).
Autonomy is very reasonable: with the constantly data yet, a lot of synchronization, notifications, and some apps instant dialogue, I want about 2 days, without forcing, which is very reasonable. To believe my stats of battery use, it is the screen that most food every time. For cons, the battery has a very big flaw: you can see by removing the hull, but theoretically not replace yourself ... (I still ignores the degree of risk-taking requires it or if batteries changed by very few will be cheap in a few years ...).
The micro SD slot is a definite plus, although 8GB give me the impression of being enough.
The touch screen keyboard is very accurate, quick to use: compared to current sub-brands or even touch an old version of a leading competitor (Samsung Galaxy first generation), it's really something else. Fortunately, we can write without losing too much time (time is money), especially given the disappearance of physical keyboards on the good smartphones from almost anywhere in the world (and I still do not know if the smartphone with keyboard suitable for networks American DCMA type are still interesting). As against the setting of the auto-correction still remains to be done to avoid being unduly hampered by a "feature".
Voice keyboard starts to give very interesting results, I use it often, although I have disabled the Automatic OK Google.
Since recent phones attract flights, and that a smartphone is designed to store a lot of confidential data (access to email box then giving easy access many more), we can be pleased that this phone offers encryption ("encryption"). By cons, in terms of the suppression on / off / remote location, this is not it:
* You have access to Google feature, but if one wishes to turn off the GPS and activate it remotely in case of theft, it is not that at all ... (But otherwise the features are Google Real progress).
* For those who require account with Motorola Moto Care, it's not that ... Error message at virtually every login during my tests. -> I now realize that the functions of Google.
Warning: the phone is hardly insurable if you buy it with an invoice without IMEI number. This is the case Amazon (among others).
I saw the progress made by Android (Google) in recent years, and this phone offers a recent version (and already for me an update).
One hesitates with the Moto X that has fallen in price (in 330 I'm not mistaken) about the same time as the arrival of the 4G version of G. Moto My decision to take the G despite the attractiveness Moto X was performed on these factors, it will not necessarily be suitable for you:
* I did not need a great camera on the colors, especially since I already have a true optical zoom (not a mobile so)
* Tests / magazines read on the Internet suggest that if my Moto X is more powerful, more suitable for gaming, but less pleasant against the battery ...
* To leave another 130 euros more on a phone that I think keep 2/3 years (I want more if it becomes reasonably possible in terms software and sustainability), it does not take me a phone with pluses and minuses compared Moto G to 4G, but more and more of which are worthwhile for me. I might be taken in the Moto X 330 however if Moto Moto G and G 4G did not exist ...
In short, in the end I put a minimum of 4 stars for this smartphone, its qualities, its positioning relative to the competition, but I have to remove 1 star out of 5 because:
* Non changeable battery is less serious
* Of a lot of little things that could improve Google on Android phones (but I would not choose an iPhone or microsoft phone either)
* Space Moto Care that is not it at all
