for beginners, says SSTP cable "double-shielded" (avoids interference), and NOT a UTP cable shielding
seller contacted told me they do not have this cable since qqs tps, Amazon knows but that the latter drags pr update the site. He then offered me two solutions: keep the cable pr 50% of the price (50% refund thus BUT THE CABLE IN QUESTION WORTH A PENALTY 25%, THIS PRICE PROPOSAL'S A SCAM) or send me a mail tag print and return (for free) the package pr then be refunded in full, which I naturally chose because I know the subject, prices, and I was aware of the phenomenon ...
For several time I'm seeing this type of case ds comments articles:
- Sending wrong item (knowingly for the most part, now it is clear seen the business that thus pass nb)
- Waiting contact or customer complaint (1st attempt, surely hoping there hoodwinked, in which case the benefit is substantial)
- Double-proposal:
1 / conservation section at reduced prices, but dishonest proposal because relatively overpriced (2nd attempt of big profit)
2 / returning the item free of charge: the most honest proposal, the only truly valid BUT that is a waste of tps (waiting package, disappointment, touch seller, parcel return, pending reimbursement in parallel with the new search procedure, control, Pending receipt of the item really and initially wished)
- Directed refund (phew !, but fortunately not seem so obvious since the start of the case)
details (we must admit certain points to be objective and therefore helpful to other buyers):
- However sympathetic seller (the one does not preclude the other, this is a commercial practice for some)
- Sending quick return label by email (one day)
- Reimbursement realized ds correct tps (after receiving parcels by the seller)
- (Pr these three reasons, I put 1 star qd it would take 0 and Sunday market prevent these type processes)
- There are honest sellers: ALL4411 to quote (since sold me the right cable, shipped with 1 or 2 days late AS IT WAS CLEARLY Me AD)
