After a few practice rounds (barefoot) in the home and on the road (with thick socks), I note the ride comfort is especially due to the slightly higher unit sales (imperceptible, but what the customer previously criticized) in connection with the good footbed significantly better than with my now to end worn everyday shoe, a Berkemann. Previously, I had a Vital, also suboptimal.
In the middle or at the heel of the Sanita is also not as wide as my predecessors. Therefore, the heel and the whole foot has a much better -also seitlichen- support in the shoe.
Because the 'blowing up' because of higher sales at Sanita is probably larger (~ 1 cm), walking falls easily (fatigue!), The sole rolls completely harmoniously.
In my previous models "fell / slipped" you "felt at the back", unfortunately, despite "toe bar", because they were just too flat; the explosion was less.
Scholl had men's and probably also for women at that time in much the same shape of the timber body as Sanita, ie 'unisex'. Scholl clogs for men's, unfortunately, no longer. 'Iowa' was also a super manufacturer at the time.
Clogs from Sanita correspond almost exactly the models (molds), which I since my youth in the late 'wearing' 70s, but in this 'were hard to come by design' and quality ever for me, at least I had not found ,
Since I wear the clogs all year (almost without exception, in snow, while cycling) because I usually umpteen times a day off and put on my shoes must, I order another 2 couples for 'in stock' is equal to - as long as it they still exist !!!
And closed in addition for the next snowy winter.
Price - performance ratio: absolutely OK!
My best wishes for the supplier Scandinavian Lifestyl and va also the manufacturer Sanita.
Supplement the commentary after 1 year:
A big problem is after months of use that the timing belt (übern Spann) is getting longer and so the walk really a very bad maintenance takes place in the shoe. As the manufacturer should urgently consider something - "intolerable" !!!
PS:
and all the drivel about "clogs for men" is "No Go" is an unnecessary diversion.
We grew up with that thing, went to school and drove InterRail, across Paris and run 'almost half' Europe and were not broken in the evening! Guys like girls they had at night and day from spring to fall. All that remained was that we slept in it (also occurred, but only in 'full' state ...) and none of the others has any subordinated something because he wore Toeffler. Apparently at that time was much more important than to make abstruse thoughts about Toeffler.
Above all, the wood is good for the feet -5840 hours per year (!!!), especially in today's world of plastic shoes, microfiber (polyester, diols, Trevira, Perlon, dralon, nylon, ...) rayon, Styrofoam and what else they persuade us all.
Our body will thank you for it in every way!
Note: If you like running on 'resilient' shoes, for they are nothing.
Moreover, one should assess especially shoes on the materials and especially after walking comfort / judge because the heel height is interested in this case, but no one at all! Or who squints because even on the sale of urbequemen Colgs?
