Better than expected to Nikon D90

Of course I read before buying also Käuferberwertungen, also here in Amazon, which are quite reliable in my experience in the trend. This Sigma 18-250 has pleasantly surprised me on my Nikon D90, I am more than satisfied with the results so far (approx. 600 images). The endurance test was now on Christmas 2009, the Sigma had shooting at the telephoto end without flash support make (children Performance nativity play) to focus the light was very poor and yet the focus was working pretty fast. The only thing that should be improved on the lens mE is the adjustability: especially at the telephoto end, the lens is noticeably stiff to adjust.. That makes the fleet work a bit tedious. But otherwise: cheaper price, as the original three-year warranty - what more could you want? And that one should not compare the results with those of image light-strong fixed focal lengths is always clear to everyone. So, as a special discount warehouse item necessarily strike. Greetings!

The following supplement for those who are confused because of the different but comments: criticism, which are spoken on this objective, are mE criticism to an already very high level of performance. The fact is that the images that are produced by this lens usually good. Point! However, when I wrestled before with professional claim, the images then analyzed meticulously on a high resolution monitor (and search for errors) then I find something. It is similar to cars: one is only happy in the upper price and performance category (the eternal and only 911 sends greetings!), The other is happy about good performance and attractive design of a "normal" cars. Where the Porsche driver (od. In accordance with the user of a Nikon AF-S lenses with a continuous light intensity 2.8) then also halt the luxury bonus on top places.
I mean the performance of this lens should provide 80-90% of daily users more than satisfied. Good 2010 for all with many great pictures!