I once read a book about Mohammed, alas I can not find, and fairly positive towards him, explaining how the Arabs, men of the desert scary like the Jews they are cousins or "brothers "(whether they admit it or not), seduced by the idea of one God of the Jews but can not" access "lack of belonging to the" chosen people ", had created their own unique God through This "prophet" belonging to their people.
The violence and cruelty of life of the Bedouins (raids, rapes, killings ...) being what they were, their god was "created" in their image, even more vengeful than the Jews and their religion s is made strong to justify violence and hatred carried by the god and his prophet Bedouin, whose hadith (reported facts of his life and his alleged words) are also drug abuse.
Wafa SULTAN shows how "custom" at the time of the Bedouins, so violent and cruel - especially vis-à-vis women - was "deified" ("canonized" or "sanctified" by her words) to through Muhammad that religion forbids skillfully in practice to separate god (see for example what it says on the Unfair division of the spoils raids which a fifth was to return to God and to Muhammad, allowing in practice Muhammad dispose alone of all the part devoted to God and to himself without anyone daring to challenge him!).
It shows and explains also the hatred and contempt of women worn by rough and violent men of that time, also "sanctified" through the behavior of Muhammad Bedouin and thus perpetuated until today, and the many "traps ", in his words, that prevent women to break free from this slavery which are conditioned from childhood the name of god, they were told!
Due to the "sanctification" of this slavery (they are not the property of men - father, brothers, husband - neither more nor less than livestock or furniture like the black slaves code), considered "indigent" "unclean" as a bonus, they believe themselves obliged to submit to, and perpetuate in turn, willingly or by force, "avenging" including other women by subjecting them to what they have they -Same suffered without daring, unable to defend themselves (see the unfortunate who were the slaves of their step-mothers, and sate with their daughters-retraction hatred that has eaten)
Ignorance and illiteracy in which they are required to confirm their total dependence on the strength of "male", often illiterate themselves, but that Islam gives all rights.
In result, besides the submission in which they are held, all the barbaric acts committed against them (until death inflicted on them, under the name of "honor killings", only to be more blank or be pregnant because they have dishonored their family, then it is most often a family man who abused them), what this woman who lived 32 years in Syria and worked as a gynecologist can attest to having lived.
I had always wondered why the adoption was not permitted in Muslim countries, none of my Muslim friends had never been able to explain. The answer finally found in this book is appalling: Muhammad had adopted a son, he began to covet the woman. So he can satisfy his desire, the adoption was challenged in principle. And Muhammad may have the wife of his "son" who had been denied - retrospectively - the quality of adopted son. The satisfaction of his lust was therefore "covered" by what has become an Islamic rule rejecting adoption!
I do not think my friend (s) Muslim (s) who practice modern Islam much like modern Christians practice Christianity, retaining FREELY that faith in one God who is good and just, know or suspect such horrors.
That's why he would not come to the idea of amalgamating Muslims and Islamists, as paradoxical as it may seem. Those are not hateful vis-à-vis non-Muslims (believers or not), those are FREE believers, those have told me, and I know the sincere, he had no objection to mixed marriages their children with anyone, Muslim or not, believer or not, those seem to have left the trap of hatred, violence, religious dictatorship imposed Islam almost everywhere ...
MUSLIMS OR NOT READ THIS BOOK EXCITING TO UNDERSTAND.
As "without the freedom to criticize it is not flattering praise", I would say that "without freedom to believe or not to believe, it is not true faith."
Hence the need to defend with a total energy of French secularism --won since the Revolution on religion "of our fathers", who was also pregnant, and the cause of many IT ALSO abominations - that no one should jeopardize.
Those who claim "custom" with the veil and the beard are just put on their co-religionists social pressure they accentuate gradually, and establish a INCONSISTENT WITH communitarianism STATEMENT OF French SECULARITY which should allow one and all to believe in what he wants or not to believe in a nation "one and indivisible."
This idolatry they manifest in the place of the time, appearance, behavior of Muhammad and his companions, and threatening us, as she broke the Arab peoples under the yoke of tyranny fell today and may break tomorrow the dream of Arab Spring (FREEDOM AND DEMOCRACY ARE NOT COMPATIBLE WITH theocracy, unlike the false discourse of religious who are about to recover, to establish their dictatorship to them, the immense and courageous effort of peoples Arabs in favor of freedom), why does the "Do not live" to the end without cars, no hospitals, no cell phone, no running water, etc ... in the desert that gave it birth, and not, as the Wafa said, taking what suits them in the free West and intriguing to bring him down?
These madmen who do not admit that one "is" Mohammed, what do they do in other "copying" its "look" in France today, in the XXI century?
If Muhammad was born today, he would be dressed like the young people of his time, today! And Khadija as young women of today! True faith has nothing to do with tinsel! My Muslim friends believe, truly believe, know that all this is hypocrisy and political manipulation (I saw "my" first veil in France on a subway platform in 1980, just after the very sad Iranian "revolution" , coincidentally) unrelated to the Faith in God! The suit does not make the man, nor the 3 piece suit honest man or a sincere believer veiled woman!
Why Islam he still condemned to live in devastated Middle Ages, in the sterile hatred, monstrous in lowering women are God's creatures TO EQUAL men, what may have been in say and write men - coincidentally, they were all men - Jews, Christians, Muslims, from antiquity and the Middle Ages?
Why only the Jews and Christians evolved? Why do not we talking more philosophers, artists, scientists, Arab doctors today while there was so great?
Why? While mankind needs so that ALL MEN ARE USED?
Why are we talking about that Muslim intolerance, Muslim barbarism, Muslim cruelty, Muslim terrorism? Why backwardness, hatred and lead the dictatorship they thought (we should also never tell the Muslim faith or Muslim religion, as this would only make sense if the "Muslims" had freedom of choice Religious prohibited precisely that)?
SULTAN Wafa noted that violence in the texts, in attitudes, in speeches, and this other violence that is to the right (if not the duty) to lie, to be disingenuous and not keep his word since that it comes to relations with non-Muslims! What god can it afford not to have moral values?
Why do you speak ever of tolerance, gentleness, righteousness, science, love, humanity, when we think of Islam? If God exists, it is necessarily benevolent and just to his creatures, it is necessarily infinitely better than the man, it is perfect, if it is not God but the Devil.
The book's title Wafa in English is: "God Who hates." Translation: "god hates." QED
