EDT was developed in the late 1970s and is reminiscent of Paco Rabanne Pour Homme, which was a few years earlier (1973) appeared.
The EDC is against the tradition of the actual Tabac fragrance (powdery, aldehyde note) from the 1950s and also corresponds to the usual smell of remaining product line.
I personally like - purely subjective - both versions (I also like but Paco Rabanne Pour Homme). I do not think this is "Opa-fragrances". I prefer the here rated EdT still two Steren from. Simply because of the unnecessary Verwirrspiels of Maurer & Wirtz, which can cause you as a customer buys something what you really did not want to have and the manufacturer is not an indication of this error gets, until it's too late: You try in a retail the Tabac tester that includes the EDC, and then accesses the EDT. Ratio (and at this point one should actually be wary): it costs just as much as the EDC, but has more perfume! At home then you tried the EdT and wonders ... and then know why EDT and EDC cost the same ...