This manual is not perfect, nor in the presentation or in his plan. This imperfection comes from the authors' desire to "stick" to the plan of the program itself is, from the point of view of mathematical science, somewhat disjointed because we wanted in high places, priority in the first year , mathematical instruments mathematical theory. This desire to "stick" to the program itself follows the fashion followed by the publisher of "all-in-one" detestable mode if it is because, specifically, destructive of the internal logic of a discipline . Notwithstanding the serious flaw - whose authors are, ultimately not responsible - for him this manual has obvious qualities of clarity. Since Cagnac, Ramis and Commeau and their legendary clarity, no publisher was capable of committing such a feat. The four stars are well deserved.