Ian Plimer describes in detail in his book "Heaven and Earth", which is why he feels the climate arguments of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate unbalanced. This does Plimer relatively serious. However, I lack a little to see, similarly, the description of common features, ie aspects, the IPCC as well as critics. Even this, it is a large amount. So the book gets a little too konfontativ. Also, there are certain things in "Heaven and Earth" that can be seen differently.
The book reminded me in scope and style very at Robert Carter's "Climate - The Counter Consensus" and "Unstoppable Warming - Every 1500 years" of Singer & Avery, all of which are written in the same style and size. The latter book is my personal favorite.
