The trick to the scale is applied just that they obviously installed a short-term memory, which records when a person with approximately equal weight (approx +/- 400g) repeatedly weighs succession. And then the first measured value is just always stubborn displayed. It looks so natural, as if the scale would be very accurate because always constantly the same value "measured" is. These ads but are unfortunately no real measurement values.
But if you so about 30 seconds between the measurements is waiting, then the 300g of clothing to be registered. There the actual measured values are then displayed so again.
The good news is that come out quite consistent results, even under these 30s waiting time. Only rarely is there time fluctuations of +/- 100g, and I'm otherwise fully satisfied with the accuracy.
The 2 star devaluation are then also not due to lack of accuracy, but simply because my nerves this Getrickse. When I use I want to see real values scales, not any data from the cache. And the balance would have indeed not even necessary because it anyway is quite accurate.
Otherwise the scales makes a good impression. At the processing can not be faulted. The fat / muscle / water / bone analysis seems to work, even if you can check these values much less of course ...;)
What's a little bothers me only that a CR is used 2032 button cell to operate. Let's see how long that lasts. As standard AAA batteries / accumulators would have preferred. But that would have to be able to see before ordering ...
