Super Easy;  Compared with the Siemens Active ironing board

Super Easy; Compared with the Siemens Active ironing board

Leifheit 76080 ironing board AirActive M White (Kitchen)

Customer Review

As well as already remarked elsewhere already here, is in this AirActive-ironing table by Leifheit a part-identical design of the Siemens-active ironing table, many alternative Interested in the.
The identical construction refers mainly to the extraction / inflation unit - through the ventilation shaft is foreseen that both models are fitted with engines from the same factory, as well as the base has a total of very great similarities. So the sound of both tables is quite similar intensity, although this Leifheit table has a slightly more pleasant tonality.

The main difference lies mainly in the material used for the ironing surface: in this model, the Leifheit ironing surface is (not the reference) of a kind of foamed plastic, while the latter consists of a metal grid at the Siemens model.

I think it also partly the weight difference between the models is - the Siemens weighs acc.Manufacturer 11.7 Kg and is really powerful to handle, while for the Leifheit ironing board weight is given as 9Kg.. He is light as a feather for me in comparison.
For me, the built-Plastic is not a problem because I never let stand on the surface the iron. The storage area for the ironing system is somewhat simpler than with the Siemens model - my Rowenta station that weighs several kilograms, takes place without any problems.

I must say that I'm more excited about the reference - is indeed a point of criticism here - and this is compared to the Siemens reference. The Leifheit reference is provided all around with a rubber, and stretches well and completely smooth on the surface. The reference to the Siemens model is indeed cut a little larger, but only around lashed with a cord. The cover sits much worse in the long run and is wrinkled.
How does the Leifheit reference in the continuous use, of course, is not in sight. In the Siemens table the annoyances occurred (and also desperate reorders of replacement covers) on only after some time. The design of the cover in this Leifheit ironing board I like the way not as good as the manufacturers could quietly come up with more variants, finally ironing tables are not always immediately cleared away, certainly not in this weight class.

The suction function is a great help when steam ironing. For me it's now no longer to use a steam generator iron without appropriate suction table. Otherwise, the ironing surface is too fast soaking wet and you can not continue ironing.
The blowing, I use only to dry thoroughly the reference something from below.

Conclusion: This model is Leifheit much easier than that I know of - identical to parts - model from Siemens. This is a distinct advantage in handling. The functionality is impeccable and virtually indispensable when operating a steam generator iron.

Coffee and milk foam top class! Rank: 5/5
August 25
Good morning choco Rank: 4/5
February 25
Pub exaggerated. Rank: 2/5
July 27
3913 GOOD PRODUCT Rank: 4/5
February 17

Related Reviews


Compared with the predecessor TX-NR 626Onkyo TX-NR636 7.2 B-Channel Network Receiver (HDMI 2.0, WiFi, Bluetooth, 4k / 60Hz, HDCP 2.2, HiRes-Audio, Music Services, Remote app) (Electronics) Tested and compared with the original battery.Samsung Li-ion Battery 1030 mAh for L100 / 110/200/210 / 310W, WB500, IT100, PL50 / 60/65, ES55 (Accessories) Compared with the new Logitech G502 mouseSharkoon Shark Force Gaming Mouse White (Personal Computers) Not suitable for brush use, not to be compared with the higher-quality product for 60 eurosW7 In the Buff Eye Colour Palette, 1er Pack (1 x 132 g) (Health and Beauty) Compared with the competition very low6x screen protector Olympus PEN Mini E-PM2 - Screen Protector foil ultra-transparent, invisible (Electronics) Flip Cover not comparable with the original qualityitronikĀ® Flip Cover Protective display cover for Samsung Galaxy SIV S4 I9195 Mini Black (Wireless Phone Accessory) Compared with the (more expensive) Pronomic CM-22 for me no audible differences!Professional condenser microphone Full Set Gold-head STUDIO Mic Broadcasting + Shock Mount for podcast webcast # 015 Compared with the Oly 9-18mmPanasonic DMW-GWC1GU Wide Converter for H-PS14042 and H-H014 22 mm (electronic) Compared with the SAL1870 the Sigma 17-70 is disappointingSigma 17-70mm 2.8-4.5 DC Macro Lens for Minolta / Sony (electronics) Not to compare with the "correct" Harry Palmer ...Harry Palmer - Men of the Apocalypse (DVD) Super AV Reciever! Small compared with the Yamaha RX-V473Pioneer VSX-923-K 7.2 AV Receiver (Airplay, control via App, DLNA, HTC Connect, MHL, vTuner web radio, Gappless playback, 2 zones, HDMI CEC, 3D, 4K Ultra HD Video Scaler) (Electronics) Good but with drawbacks (Zx5 compared with the Zx1)Kodak Playsport Zx5 Full HD camcorder (5.1 cm (2 inch) display, SD / SDHC card slot, 5x digital zoom, HDMI, up to 3m waterproof) green (Electronics) A review which will allow us to compare with the S4Samsung Galaxy S5 smartphone (5-inch display, 16GB of memory, Android 5) charcoal-black (Wireless Phone) The all-round talent - compared with the previousLG BP620 3D Blu-ray player (Smart TV, DLNA, Wi-Fi, HDMI, 1080p upscaler, USB) Black (Personal Computers) Back to the roots - compared with the RCR-22 (from 2013, blue display)Sangean RCR-2 RCR2SI Digital Clock Radio (PLL Synthesized Tuner, LCD Display) silver (Electronics) Daily compared with the iPhone 4Samsung Galaxy S III i9300 16GB Smartphone (12.2 cm (4.8 inches) HD Super AMOLED touchscreen, 8 megapixel camera, Micro-SIM, Android 4.0) marble-white (Electronics) New is not always better - the WX200 in the test and compared with the WX5Sony DSC-WX200 digital camera (18.2 megapixels Exmor R sensor, 10x opt. Zoom, 6.9 cm (2.7 inch) LCD screen, 25mm wide-angle lens, Wi-Fi function) Silver (Electronics) Compared with the original fixed focal length significantly better than expectedSony SEL-1855 18-55mm E-mount lens silver (Accessories)