I enjoyed this introduction. It is well worth its 4 stars or 5. The author compares two back to back contemporary thinkers over the centuries of the Middle Ages. It is usually very clear and easy to read (except the part Averroes Avicenna, a little confused I found). It makes you want to go further. Only downside = the few passages in which the author seems to settle scores with whomever He then spent two or three pages to explain that the historian must not carry out its analysis of the time he is studying, but must consider the facts and written in the current of thought that saw the birth ...
