Comparative Test

Comparative Test

Beurer 9000+ IPL device Semi-Permanent Hair Removal Pulsed Light (Health and Beauty)

Customer Review

Test article by my wife.
Having the experience of this type Unit-I has the Remington - IPL6000 - Epilator Light Pulsée-, so I can talk about this system knowingly. Threw skeptical about the effectiveness of this type Unit-but that javoue jen'm finally really satisfied. For the record, hair removal for me was a real problem with very sensitive skin, exit the manual razor (cuts, hair that grows fast and thick, not smooth legs), exit the hot wax (too sensitive), also the exit cold wax (too much hassle) jen got electric epilators, certainly effective, not too painful, but the hair often poorly rejected, under the skin, and therefore a result "sweetness" very inconclusive And here jen to come to epilators pulsed light.
Concerning my first experience (with the Remington) of this type Unit-is very positive. As a tester, Amazon leaves us quun months to give our opinion on the test product Unit-For this type, so it is impossible to give a real opinion on the efficiency because it takes at least 7 sessions sapercevoir change. Of the 2 tested devices (Remington and one that concerns us here, Beurer), these recommendations are identical. Knowing that the first 4 sessions should be spaced more dau least 15 days, we can in as little time to account for the effectiveness of hair removal. However, I can rely on my previous experience because I lai since more than a year. Given the results, yes, I recommend this type of Unit-general, and this one in particular, for several reasons.
- First, since this type Unit-jOperation, I saw significant results. Hairs that grow back significantly fewer and therefore term hair removal that will "someday" final. I make it clear "someday" because this is not radical depilation after 7 sessions, far be sen. It will come back from time to time (about 1 time per month), for the hairs that have grown in the meantime (see quau time you pluck, they are not all at the same stage of growth cycle). Also, be aware "program" his hair removal: to do so winter to almost perfect legs in spring. Then come back occasionally. After 7 sessions of "basic", you will also see a marked improvement in skin smoothness, it, this is quite impressive!
- The Beurer, meanwhile is significantly better than the Remington for various reasons.
It features a cartridge with no less than 100 000 light pulses! Knowing that depilatory 2 lower legs, you'll need about 260 flashes (i did the math DAfter my own testing), you have of a depilation device for years: more than 380 sessions, without changing lamp! On this point, my old Remington exit, which came with 3 lamps, each flash data for 1500, 17 sessions toutQuand we know the price of cartridges, avoid!
In addition, the dimensions of its "window" flashes (7 cm), rather large, makes hair removal quicker -about 20 minutes, depilatory 2 half legs- and cheaper (less than flashes are necessary). Again, Beurer is better than my Remington (2 cm² window);
In terms of lergonomie and ease of use: no doubt, the Beurer did even better: the denclenchement button flashes is better placed on the applicator, which finger engages the impulse needs less force and is not likely to tense up (especially in automatic mode where you have to keep his finger on the button flashes every 3 seconds).
Question tolerance, yet i a clear preference for the Beurer. The two devices are equipped of a level of energy selector -from 1 to 6 and I find that the highest level among Beurer is less unpleasant than in Remington. But this is a very personal aspect: the sensitivity of a person is very different to the other and depending on the location of the body.
One more thing which seems to me important: The Beurer comes in a thick cardboard box, lined inside of a very convenient plastic thermoforming. Everything is very easily and quickly put away and takes up little space. The packaging of Remington is not at all functional and oversized
Finally, minor drawbacks:
I regret that the device is not provided with a pair of goggles against the flashes (not required by manufacturers), nor cloth to clean the flash window.
The flash window is quite large dimensions, some parts of the bony body (eg ankles) are more difficult to treat: it is necessary to properly position the applicator fumble if the flash does not fire (for safety).

THE reportage lens for Mu43 Rank: 4/5
March 22
Very good phone at low prices. Rank: 5/5
December 7
Good stuff! 2961 Rank: 4/5
October 27
Super Kit 4 Rank: 4/5
July 26
Middle. 680 Rank: 2/5
January 22
Quick delivered and used quickly Rank: 5/5
February 13

Related Reviews


The big brother of the LS-T10 compared testOnkyo LS-T30 (B) TV SoundBase speaker system (3D sound, built-in subwoofer, Bluetooth, Dolby Digital / DTS sound mode) (Electronics) Comparative testing with photos - LE LED 7W cold vs. LE LED 6W Warm vs. Matt light bulb 60WLighting EVER 6 Watt A55 E27 LED bulb, LED lamp, Replaces 50 watt bulbs, warm white, interior lighting, lamps (tool) Comparative Test Olympus OM-D EM5 with HLD-6 and OM-D EM 1Olympus HLD-6 battery grip compatible for OM-D E-M5 or BLN-1 battery (optional) Comparative Test L'Oréal and Nivea SensitiveL'Oréal Paris Men Expert Hydra Sensitive Shaving, 6-pack (6 x 200 ml) (Health and Beauty) Winner in my very private comparative testJaguar Razor blade Quick ORCA +10 (JT2) (Health and Beauty) Good test, have comparative test madePregnancy Test hCG (early test) 10 mIU / ml - 20 test strips (Personal Care) Comparative Test removing dog hair u. Cat hair on clothing, upholstery, bedding, carpetsTrixie 2328 pet hair remover on both sides, red (Misc.) Comparative Test Coffee vs. Hand filtersSeverin KA 5740 Coffeemaker "Café Caprice" with stainless steel thermos, black / to 8 cups / 1400W (household goods) Super price / performance ratio and good test results in my Nikon D800Transcend Ultimate SDXC Class 10 speed UHS-1 64GB memory card (up to 90MB / s read, 600x) [Amazon Frustration-Free Packaging] (optional) V800: a GPS RF multisport clock like no other! Practical tests in Trainingsmix to Marathon; Tests & comparisons (eg Fenix ​​2)Polar training computers V800, Black, 90,047,437 (equipment) Fail (tested with the Canon 6D)Canon EF 70-300mm 1: 4-5.6 L IS USM lens (67mm filter thread) (Accessories) Compared with Minolta 24-85 f / 3.5-4.5Sony SAL-18135 DT 18-135mm f / 3.5-5.6 SAM zoom lens (accessory) I love them and I hate them a bit! (Compared with Canon 40D, Sony NEX-5N, Canon S95)Fujifilm X10 Digital Camera (12MP, 4x Optical Zoom, 7.1 cm (2.8 inch) display) (Electronics) It pays to compare!Sony SRS-X3 NFC and Bluetooth Speakers, White (Electronics) Compare AKG K701 / Sennheiser HD 650AKG K-701 Wired Hi-fi Headphones Diaphragm dual layer pads "3d-form" Cable 3m (Electronics) Compare Sennheiser HD 650 / AKG K701Sennheiser HD650 Open Stereo Headphones (Electronics) Transalp tested and found to be suboptimalF100 2860 Chain Oil, 300 ml (equipment) Cereal in TestBohlsener mill naked oat, 6-pack (6 x 1000 g) - Organic (Food & Beverage) Compared to A37 and A58Sony SLT-A57K SLR digital camera (16 megapixel APS HD CMOS, 7.5 cm (3 inch) screen, Live View, Full HD Video) incl. SAL 18-55mm lens (Electronics)