When my v2 stopped working, so it's logical that I turned to the new iteration of the range Siberia, eyes closed I dare say. Great evil has taken me. I will say nothing about the design because it is obviously subjective and that basically this is not the biggest downside of the helmet. That said, I have several reproach him
- Its finish: the helmet is cheap once it has on the ears, like a bad helmet while plastic. Atria of the foams are not as comfortable as those of v2 and plastics are noisy once one passes the finger on (once the headphones on, it is very unpleasant).
- His arch: I discovered the hoops helmets with v2 and I told myself that I would never return to traditional headphones. But it seems that the arch has been shortened v3. Once set up, I had the impression of maximum stretch and feel the head is quite unseemly.
- Sound: too Basseux for me. Okay, it's nice to listen to certain kinds of music but, frankly, it quickly drunk. If it does not pass through an equalizer to put them back, they almost drown the midrange and treble. We are far from a neutral sound.
- Microphone: from the first audio conferences that I have done, my correspondents tell me that you could hear me from far away, as if I was away from the mic (while the latter was beside right my mouth). It does not look like that, but hearing your buddies ask to repeat what you just said it was urgent then, well ... it makes crazy fast. In addition, the microphone picks up sound from the atria - it is shameful for a helmet at this price.
The only advantage of the helmet, I think, is to have relocated the latch mute the microphone on the left atrium and not in the middle of a cable remote control. But honestly, it's not it will make me keep this helmet.
The result: after only a few days of use, the headset will return to the sheds Amazon while I repeat a Siberia v2, safe bet for a lower price. You can get a headset with a much better quality for a much lower price.
