I've read through the seller reviews of other users with smart moxx exactly. Frequently one reads there is exceeded by MHD in various printer cartridges. I simply point times that the original packaging has been removed so that the MHD is no longer visible. That it is completely filled cartridge sales, I suppose. I have my in Sa * urn purchased cartridges are not separately weighed. But the waves of smart moxx including plastic wrap about 51, x grams. Sounds fine with me, but as I said, had no comparison ... It does not matter, I did not want it out, sorry that I write so much about the bush;)
What I meant to say was really only that it is likely to order cartridges with far is exceeded MHD acts that are not sold in their original packaging, so that the buyer does not notice anything. Subject, of course, only the provider of smart-moxx (EDIT: perhaps other vendors .. but my cartridges were just smart moxx).
Who does not like the review because he would rather learn something about the cartridges yourself ... please:
Of course are more expensive than imitation NoName cartridges. The Cheap things I had never for Brother, but with HP I've had bad experiences with the NoName cartridges (leak, etc.). Therefore my originals go for my printer only into the house.
Unfortunately, it is here (as with all other I have already tested printer manufacturers also) the case that the cartridges are "empty" very quickly. In reality, the cartridges are not empty of course, but usually even fairly well filled. But the built-in chip makes of course that the printer says the cartridge is "empty". That's well known. Who is stingy and not particularly on his printer hangs (because eh soon a new is due, or why what I know ..), I would recommend some games to try the cheap cartridges. On my HP printer cartridges imitation were always very much ergibiger than the originals, and brought the same color space. (By the way: HP provides significantly better color, but the software is a disaster, is my opinion). But as I said, is associated with a higher risk.
So it was;)