English fairness

The booklet, which I suppose in the breast pocket of the English soldiers stuck when he marched into Germany to tell him how he had to behave in the devastated enemy territory: tough but fair. The greater part of the book deals with Germany from British point of view it is characterized in a concise, comprehensible and in my opinion, simplifying and still largely true, the history, and special situation of Germany late in the war.

Very well know the author of the book to distinguish between Nazi Germany and the "better" Germany, which has been enriched with works of art, science and technology world. This is not self-evident, given the incomprehensible atrocity that has done to the other countries of this country, and from the text can open up that the authors of such an objectifying attitude is also not an easy one.
How about a similar breviary of the Soviet Union failed? She had to complain most of the victims, the image of Germany and the Germans would be somewhat understandable, probably have been terrible.

But you stick to the hard line. Germany should feel the punishment they deserve from the perspective of England. Rightly it is determined that the reign of Hitler and his followers had no unfortunate twist of fate, but could rely on the consent of the people. There was an inner connection between Hitler and the average Germans to rule on aggression, militarism and racism, obedience, opportunism and the urge to dominate and, based. England would have all of these things do not happen, I add, because, as the booklet, German and English may be similar in appearance, but inside quite and are even different.

What our fathers that have survived the war and died in him, would have said to this little book, would you say? Anyway, I am of the opinion that the guide has been launched at right back.