Expensive but very effective consumable

Both say immediately: the brushes cost a Philips 2 times the price of those offered by Oral B. Price equivalent brush. On regular use (3 brushings per day) count 2 brushes per month. About 15. It makes a difference of 90 per year with lhomologue home Oral B.
But is that this price is justified? Yes and no. Everything will depend on the type of brush you want.
Jai had Oral B for 7 years (2 models). When the battery last brush made soul, I'm tempted by the Philips brush that i use for a year. But i also another brush Oral B at home recently. Jai could compare.
Philips brush vibrates much faster. The brush hairs are certainly more fragile, but also softer. Result, Philips is much less aggressive with the gums, and delivers a particularly pleasant soft feel.
For accessories, for the same price, the Philips offers glass induction charging, very convenient. Thus quune hard case also offering charging induction via a USB cable. The latter is unfortunately difficult to clean, and very exposed to outside. Another bad point, we can not put the brushes with their protective plastic, which exposes them to a lot of bacteria, not ideal for a toothbrush.
Verdict: I prefer Philips, from far away. I regret that the brushes are so expensive and so difficult to find in supermarkets. But brushing delivered by the Philips is much more pleasant for me.
The Oral B equivalent (equivalent engine model) provides a slower brushing. The bristles of the brushes (even on the "sensitive" model) are hard and hurt the gums. It's hard to really advise brushing, it depends on individual preferences. You just keep in mind that brushing Philips is softer.