For the price acceptable with 2 large weaknesses

I bought this smartphone as a pure secondary device to conveniently send SMS in other EU countries and so on as a substitute in case my primary FR is defective.

Basically, I am very surprised at what is one offered here for just under 80 euros.
A very fast device (1.3GHz quad-core) with latest Android 4.4.2.

Scrolling in all menus, loading apps and surfing the net is all top. Here you can really fault anything.
From a performance point of it is comparable to a Moto G 2014 (processor and memory)

The gaming performance is not comparable, since a cheap Mali GPU is incorporated, which can not compete with the Adreno the Moto G. But is sufficient for most games.

Here then the display resolution comes into play. This is very low 854x480 pixels. For a 5 inch device very little. This is particularly noticeable when reading scriptures etc. which act a bit rough and frayed. However, the low resolution facilitates the weak GPU work, which are just about all games also reasonably playable.

The brightness and viewing angles are surprisingly good and do not need to hide. The display is really good for the price and you get used to the lack of sharpness.

The reception characteristics are very good. GPS, WiFi, 3G .. everything's alright and very fast.

The other processing is good. No major gaps or protruding edges. The Display Glass is well incorporated.
From the back it looks like a Samsung Galaxy S5, in which case the heart rate monitor was replaced by a "double" LED.

Let's talk about the 2 biggest criticisms (at least on my machine)

The camera with the "Double" flash.

I know, for 80 euros you can not expect everything to be perfect and somewhere we have to save just one. The camera is just bad!
1. very low resolution
2. usually does not focus properly (although it takes 1-2 seconds and displays a green focus box)
3. LED flash is at most a weak lamp. There are 2 LEDs, like the iPhone is as high as one white and one yellow. But they have far too little power to illuminate even begin an object.

Possibly enough the camera for an emergency ... But it is not really fun.

2. Large drawback: The battery

The battery is said to have 2000 mAh. I can not check whether this is so, but I can not believe it.
Actually, he does not have much to supply: a mediocre processor, a low-resolution display and connectivity modules such as WLAN etc.
And he also makes a good standby time of 2-3 days. When using the device then right times, the battery level drops quickly.

That's all not so bad, because if a charge indicator is continuously smaller, you can plan and recharge.
In my unit, it was so that the display off and are to remain on a level and then at some point rapidly goes at once to 0 and the unit turns off.
Example: I take it with the morning, 52% battery. I used the Navi and music for about 15 minutes on the bike. On arrival: 50%. After 30 minutes it comes back the same distance and after 10 minutes the unit will go out.

Home then to the charger and the battery level was at 1%.

Example 2: 15 clock still almost 60% battery and then I look at 17 clock on it and it is at 13%.

One can not foresee how really empty the battery is so easy. I can go through an app for calibration. But that has not helped.

So summary:

The device is good for the price. On a good camera I can do without at this price, but I need a reliable battery. Who at home has always lying around a battery bank and is always with you, can charge the battery at such a unforeseen slump again.
But who has no chance and this risk simply will not go into who should possibly be after something else around.
It may be of course that I caught a Monday device with a defective battery.

Altogether, the following rating:

Device per se / processing: 4/5 stars
Connectivity: 4/5 stars
Display: 2.5 / 5 stars
Speed ​​/ smooth work: 3.5 / 5 stars
Battery: 1/5 stars
Camera: 1.5 / 5 stars

Overall grade accordingly: 2.75 Stars

Bonus: it only costs 80 euros and it has Android 4.4.2: + 0.5 Stars

So 3.25 stars out of 5.