/ * Everyone will appreciate a pregnant differently depending on sound quality that gives it: it depends on personal taste.
I advise you, before buying an enclosure like this, you do not rely solely on the recommendations you can find on the internet. It is best to make a list of strengths and weaknesses that people have found him to listen to and compare it to others to form his own opinion. This type of product is now widespread, your friends will surely have templates that allow you to compare and choose * /
Jai tested this enclosure in exactly the same conditions as the Philips BT2500B / 00 (its walls thoroughly, same room, same smartphone in its background, same software, same musical shuffle of a sample).
Unpacking, nothing special (all the more that the model i received is gray). It's even simpler summary, built in cheaper materials than Philips but still the impression of something well built, perhaps stronger than Philips in case of fall, test that I have not done, probably less over time.
The range is maximum 10 meters (Bluetooth class 3) lappairage easy short, it's easy to implement.
Jai measured maximum noise level the autonomy and found 10:26 !!!!! As for the full charge, it takes 2:50 (I recommend strongly avoid too frequent rapid charging as they may severe damage to both the speaker system battery, battery is not removable). This is an incredible autonomy compared to other speakers and compared with the manufacturer's data (for the record, under the same conditions, javais 4:32 reached with Philips. So much so that what jattendais to weaken its independence and noted that despite the random playback, i thought live the film Groundhog Day.
Even I would have received a dune model with super battery and you nobteniez that half of the autonomy that i measured the manufacturer's commitments are more than required.
The beginning of the rest of my column is similar to the Philips BT2500B / 00.
The hands-free function works correctly even if I was better implemented on the Philips BT2500B / 00. We hear and we heard clearly.
As with all Bluetooth speaker, we are not in the field of Hi-Fi:
This enclosure nétant compatible either with the aptX codec or with WVA, the sound suffers from the use of the wrong SBC codec. This extremely simple codec was created there over 10 years he fact that an integral part of the Bluetooth standard since 2002. originally, it was done with a very low speed and therefore have Bluetooth to transmit a minimum dinformation. If you play on your transmitter, for example, an mp3, it will be decoded and recoded by SBC transmitter, and transmitted to the speaker system which decodes it. Few data are transmitted much is lost which explains its quun encoded SBC is lower than the mp3.
The sound of the Philips BT2500B / 00 Portable Bluetooth Speaker P1 with integrated microphone and battery black mavait not totally convinced. My overall impression is that it is quite deaf, as muffled, missing dampleur. This may be related to the fact that he has ny quun speaker. Jai much less appreciated than the Logitech.
To start, the noise level is low (which explains the long autonomy from Philips much more powerful). This will go for a room of 15m2 provided quon not speak to or down. You can not have a pregnant tutti pokey and sound maousse costo.
Severe (below 200 Hz) is absent, the midbass (200Hz 400 Hz) there seems perfunctory. This clearly saméliore after Completion beginning of hyperacute (beyond 10,000 Hz) where again these frequencies are absent.
Speaker system also lacks dynamics quite markedly, while seeming almost the same sound level. This is probably due to this new mode to the entrance mini speaker range which is to limit (often too) dynamics to avoid distortion. Because I havent heard any distortion or saturation.
Overall, for me, this place didnt sound good and its physical characteristics (size, power), it was impossible that it otherwise.
Once all these defects indicated (at least for me, it is not necessarily your case so let your ears get an idea for themselves), it should be remembered that this is a chamber at 40 euros.
If the sound is not good at labsolu, it is higher than the speakers of which are decked out internally smartphones, tablets and computers.
For me, the quality of this place is its mobility: it fits in the palm of the hand, weighs 160g (weight measured because there is much higher values in some descriptions for a range of between I remember that found and that ( much lower) announced by the manufacturer. We will say at least 7 hours for a load I measured at 1:53.
Like Philips, it seems to me first of all intended for those who want to increase the sound level while knowing that the sound will not be of high quality and best sound in a vocal and instrumental, their smartphone, tablet, laptop without carry a bulkier pregnant.
For me (but again, get an opinion by yourself), it is lower, in terms of building that made the sound, the Philips BT2500B / 00.
I would give it 3.5 * 4 * rounded, given its autonomy and its compactness and its modest price.
In short, if I were, between the two:
- Advancing the sound and construction, jachèterais BT2500B / 00
- Advancing the small volume and the autonomy, the Logitech X100
